Flyer

Journal of FisheriesSciences.com

  • Journal h-index: 32
  • Journal CiteScore: 28.03
  • Journal Impact Factor: 24.27
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Academic Journals Database
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • The Global Impact Factor (GIF)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Proquest Summons
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • Advanced Science Index
  • International committee of medical journals editors (ICMJE)
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • J-Gate
  • Chemical Abstract
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • ResearchGate
  • University of Barcelona
Share This Page

Abstract

Effects of androstenedione on sex reversal and gonadal development in the African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)

Funda TURAN

In this study, effects of androstenedione on sex reversal and gonadal develoment of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) were firstly investigated. Androstenedione is a natural steroid hormone and occurs naturally in pollen from certain pine trees. The different concentrations of natural (0, 25, 50 ve 75 mg/L ) hormone were applied by immersion method on two days old C. gariepinus larvae with average initial weights of 2.80±0.07 mg for one month and effects of hormone on sex reversal and gonadal development were also studied at the end of 120 days. At the end of experiment, all dosage groups at androstenedione treatment were similar, which were not significantly different from the control (P>0.05). The highest sex reversal (58%) was observed at 50 mg\l androstenedione group. In addition, mean growth rate, gonad weight and gonadosomatic index values of androstenedione treatments were compared from the control group with t-test and found no significant differences (P