Journal of Neurology and Neuroscience

Keywords

Aerobic exercise; Exercise; Neural plasticity; Physical therapy

Introduction

Neural plasticity is the “ability of neurons to change their function, chemical profile (amount and types of neurotransmitters produced) or structure” [1]. It is essential for recovery from damage to the central nervous system. Injuries that damage or severe axons cause degeneration, but may not result in cell death. Injuries that destroy the cell body of a neuron invariably lead to death of the cell. When neuron dies, the nervous system promotes recovery by altering specific synapses, functionally reorganizing the central nervous system (CNS) and changing neurotransmitter release in response to neural activity.

The exercise training is an effective therapy for CNS dysfunctions like stroke, traumatic brain injuries etc. which has been applied to clinic. Traditionally, the exercise training has been considered to improve brain function only through enhancement, compensation, and replacement of the remaining function of nerve and muscle [2-4].

Recently, accumulating evidences indicated that exercise training can improve the function in different levels from end- effector organ such as skeletal muscle to cerebral cortex.

The researchers used different methods including brain scans, Electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings, functional Magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET) scan and blood as well as saliva sampling to investigate the exercise-induced brain activity and volume changes in different brain areas including frontal and central regions of the brain, the hippocampus, cerebellum, and the motor cortex [3,5].

A very important and unresolved question in the neural plasticity and injury fields is whether exercise-that is, specific retraining of injured neural circuits-can drive, alter, or enhance neural plasticity subsequent to brain lesions. Exercise is often prescribed after brain injury, but the basis for how training can influence brain plasticity and recovery is unclear.

Objective of this study is to elicit the evidence for effect of exercise on neural plasticity.

Literature Review

Source

A comprehensive search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, clinical keys database using keywords neural plasticity, exercise, strength training, aerobic exercise, physiotherapy by using Boolean AND.

Study selection

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (Human and animal) and RCTs studies related to neural plasticity and exercise training published in English since 2005 are included in the study. RCTs which are purely animal studies are excluded (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Flow chart of methodology.

Data extraction

Studies objectives, methods, subjects (human or animal), participant characteristics, interventions, outcomes, results are reviewed by the reviewers separately and final data summary made by consensus (Tables 1-3).

Note: ↑: Increases; ↓: Decreases; MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination; AE: Aerobic Exercise; TCMS: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Table 1: Review of evidence on effect of exercise on neural plasticity.

Note: ↑: Increases; ↓: Decreases; MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination; AE: Aerobic Exercise; TCMS: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; EEG: Electroencephalogram

Table 2: Summary of review.

Note: ↑: Increases; ↓: Decreases; MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination; AE: Aerobic Exercise; TCMS: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; EEG: Electroencephalogram

Table 3: Intervention period and evidence of effect on neural plasticity.

Studies were categorized by following levels of evidence:

Level I (systematic reviews, meta-analyses, RCTs),

Level II (nonrandomized controlled trials, casecontrol trials),

Level III (pre-test–post-test designs, crosssectionaldesigns),

Level IV (single-subject designs, case series),Level V (case reports, narrative literature reviews).

Discussion

Following brain injury, both the intensity of rehabilitation and the amount of time between the injury and the initiation of rehabilitation influences the recovery. There are less published clinical trials on humans supporting intervention period, type and intensity for effective neural plasticity followed by CNS dysfunction. Applicability of animal trails to humans is not established well.

The systematic review by Duzel et al. [6] found mild to moderate exercise program can prevent hippocampal atrophy and there is no much difference in volume in moderate to intensive exercise with less duration i.e 3 months. It is also related with increase in cardiovascular fitness and memory score. Physical activity combined with cognitive stimulation shows changes in shrinkage of hippocampus and increase in synapsis which can correlate with treatment in alzimers. There is individual variability with side effects intermediate outcome markers in some individuals with risk factors like cardiovascular and metabolic problems can go for vascular incidence so the adverse effects can be identified and kept as criteria for terminating and adapting intensity of exercises. In a RCT ScheeweT et al. [7] observed that overall improvement in cardio vascular fitness increases total cerebral volume in scrizopenia patients in compare to healthy group. Cortical thickening in the hemisphere shows that moderate exercise program improves fitness as well as increase the production of neuro trophic growth factors which give importance in neuro genesis, so there by concludes that exercise plays role in neural plasticity which decreases brain abnormalities in conditions like schizophrenia. In a research study by Styliadis et al. [8]. mild cognitive impairment patients showed changes in EEG with combined cognitive and physical exercise, which implies that, both physical and cognitive training can change the brain activity. The neuroplastic outcome was interpreted with delta and theta reduction in MCI patients. Pin-Barre et al. [9] Found that in neuro degenerative conditions exercise has positive impact on cognition and increase in production of new neurons and neuro tropic factors in hippocampus. In conditions like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s the memory function improved with short and long-term exercises and prevent hippocampal impairment and behavioural deficits [10].

The exercise has an impact on learning and memory and more evident with functions like running activity [11]. The students who participate in aerobic activity or fitness have improved their cognitive capabilities. The hippocampal volumes in older individual between 60 to 72 years old has an association with aerobic capacity and their ability in performing memory tasks [12]. Compared to waking the running activity facilitates the growth hormones and endorphins and neuro genesis in hippocampal area. Prolonged lack of active movement following cortical injury may lead to subsequent loss of function in adjacent, undamaged regions of the brain (Animal study) [13], However, excessively vigorous rehabilitation of motor function too soon after the injury can be counterproductive (Animal study)

Optimal exercise regime

Preliminary data in humans and evidence from animal studies suggest that improving brain function would require 3-6 Months of moderate to high intensity training. In contrast, preservation of function can be best demonstrated with prolonged regimes where mild to moderate levels are more practical.

Conclusion

The result of this review provides evidence that exercise drives compensatory structural adaptation in functionally relevant subsets of neurons to enhance behavioral recovery and cognitive changes after brain insult and measurable functional level of the patient.

Limitations

Evidence for Intensity, type of exercises, and early intervention period for attaining maximal neural plasticity is lack in clinical trials in humans

Clinical Implication

We can optimize recovery by initiating therapy early, avoiding vigorous use or overuse of impaired extremities during the first few days post CNS injury, and practicing specific tasks to elicit beneficial adaptive neural plasticity.

References

1. Woolf C (2000) Neuronal plasticity: Increasing the gain in pain. Science 288: 1765-1768.
2. Lee IM, Hennekens CH, Berger K, Buring JE, Manson JE (1999) Exercise and risk of stroke inmale physicians. Stroke 30: 1-6.
3. Deplanque D, Masse I, Lefebvre C, Libersa C, Leys D, et al. (2006) Prior TIA, lipid-lowering drug use, and physical activity decrease ischemic stroke severity. Neurology 67: 1403-1410.
4. Stroud N, Mazwi TML, Case LD (2009) Prestroke physical activity and early functional status after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 80: 1019-1022.
5. Reid L, Boyd R, Cunnington R, Rose S (2016) Interpreting intervention induced neuroplasticity with fMRI: The case for multimodal imaging strategies. Neural Plasticity 2016: 1-13.
6. Duzel E, Van Praag H, Sendtner M (2016) Can physical exercise in old age improve memory and hippocampal function? Brain 139: 662-673.
7. Scheewe T, Van Haren N, Sarkisyan G, Schnack H, Brouwer R, et al. (2013) Exercise therapy, cardiorespiratory fitness and their effect on brain volumes: A randomised controlled trial in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 23: 675-685.
8. Styliadis C, Kartsidis P, Paraskevopoulos E, Ioannides A, Bamidis P (2015) Neuroplastic effects of combined computerized physical and cognitive training in elderly individuals at risk for dementia: An eLORETA controlled study on resting states. Neural Plasticity 2015: 1-12.
9. Pin BC, Laurin J (2015) Physical exercise as a diagnostic, rehabilitation, and preventive tool: Influence on neuroplasticity and motor recovery after stroke. Neural Plasticity 2015: 1-12.
10. Baek S (2016) Role of exercise on the brain. J Exercise Rehab12: 380-385.
11. Schulkin J (2016) Evolutionary basis of human running and its impact on neural function. Front Sys Neurosci 10.
12. Murdoch K, Buckley J, McDonnell M (2016) The effect of aerobic exercise on neuroplasticity within the motor cortex following stroke. PLoS ONE 11: e0152377.
13. Nudo R, Wise B, SiFuentes F, Milliken G (1996) Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272: 1791-1794.