Flyer

Journal of Universal Surgery

  • ISSN: 2254-6758
  • Journal h-index: 6
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.94
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.82
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • J-Gate
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
  • Zenodo
Share This Page

Research - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 10

Incidence of Development of Perianal Fistula after Perianal Abscess Surgery

Mr. Tarek Garsaa1*, Mr. Khandakar Rezwanur Rahman2 and Dr. Stephen Olphert3
 
1Consultant General and Colorectal Surgeonm, Ysbyty Gwynedd hospital, Bangor, UK
2Junior Clinical Fellow, Dept of General and Colorectal Surgery, UK
3ST4, Registrar, Dept of General and Colorectal Surgery, UK
 
*Correspondence: Mr. Tarek Garsaa, Consultant General and Colorectal Surgeonm, Ysbyty Gwynedd hospital, Bangor, UK, Email:

Received: 30-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. IPJUS-22-13109; Editor assigned: 03-Oct-2022, Pre QC No. IPJUS-22-13109 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-Oct-2022, QC No. IPJUS-22-13109; Revised: 21-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. IPJUS-22-13109 (R); Published: 28-Oct-2022, DOI: 10.36648/2254- 6758.22.10.70

Introduction

Anorectal abscesses and fistulas can be thought of as two sequential phases of the same anorectal infectious process: an abscess represents the acute phase of infection, while a fistula represents the chronic phase of suppuration and fistula formation. [1] The majority of anorectal suppurative disease results from infections of the anal glands (cryptoglandular infection) found in the inter-sphincteric plane [2]. Their ducts traverse the internal sphincter and empty into the anal crypts at the formation of an abscess that enlarges and spreads along one of several planes in the perianal and perirectal spaces. As an abscess enlarges, it spreads in several directions. The most common presentation is a painful, tender swelling at the anal verge [3]. Treatment is Incision and Drainage as soon as diagnosis is confirmed. Drainage of anorectal abscess results in cure for about 50% patients. Remaining 50% develop a persistent fistula in ano. The fistula originates in the infected crypt (internal opening) and tracks to the outside (usually site of prior drainage), following the previous abscess cavity (Sabiston) [4].

Objective

The purpose of this study is to find the number of cases of perianal abscess that underwent Incision and Drainage at Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, North Wales, in the last 3 years, and the percentage that developed a perianal fistula [5, 6].

Method

This was done as a retrospective study, taking data from November 2018 till November 2021. Both emergency and elective surgeries for perianal abscess were considered, which came out to be 150 surgeries in total. Data was collected from electronically stored operation notes and cross checked with patient records, maintaining confidentiality throughout [7,8]. Patients who underwent any surgical procedure (Examination under anesthesia, Incision and Drainage, etc) for perianal abscess were included. Any patient that was treated conservatively, ischiorectal abscess, necrotizing fasciitis, and gluteal/genital abscess or patients who only presented with a fistula were not included in this study. Electronic records were checked to follow up for development of any new fistula [9].

Results

In total 150 cases of perianal abscess were done in the mentioned timeframe. In comparison, 37 cases of only perianal fistula were also done. Among the abscess cases, 85 were Male and 65 were Female. Almost all cases presented as emergency condition and were operated as such, except 3 cases where an abscess was found incidentally while performing EUA/Flexible Sigmoidoscopy [10-12]. The results are summarized in (Table 1 and Figure 1).

Mode of surgery Perianal Abscess=150 Perianal Fistula=37
Male Female Male Female
Emergency 82 65 19 18
Elective 3 0 0 0
Total 85 65 19 18

Table 1: Total number of Perianal Abscess and Perianal Fistula Surgery. journal-universal-perianal

Figure 1: 150 cases of perianal abscess.

Out of the 150 cases of perianal abscess, there were 23 patients who presented multiple times with similar problems. The rest 127 patients did not come back with any perianal abscess/fistula [13]. Of the 23 patients who required further surgeries after their perianal abscess surgery, 9 were Male and 14 were Female. Regarding age groups, age group 20 to 30 years had 9 patients; 30 to 40 years had 6 Patients, 40 to 50 years had 3patients, >50years had 2 patients (Figure 2). Out of the 23, 6 patients had already developed a fistula at their first presentation, while 14 developed a fistula later on [14,15]. 9 people did not develop any fistula despite some needing multiple I&D/EUAs. These Results have been summarized in (Table 2 and Figure 3). Out of the relapsing 23 patients, 16 had no significant comorbidities. 5 had Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the form of Crohn’s Disease, and 2 had Diabetes Mellitus. The level of immunosuppression and the degree/extent of disease control are beyond the scope of this research [16-18].

Gender No fistula Developed Fistula
1st surgery 2nd Surgery 3rd Surgery 4th Surgery
Male 4 2 2   1
Female 5 4 3 2  
Total 9 14

Table 2: Out of 23 cases with repeat presentations. journal-universal-patients

Figure 2: Out of the 23, 6 patients had already developed a fistula at their first presentation, while 14 developed a Fistula later on. 9 people did not develop any fistula despite some needing multiple I&D/EUAs.

journal-universal-immunosuppression

Figure 3: The level of immunosuppression and the degree/extent of disease control are beyond the scope of this research.

Conclusion

From this study we found out that among 150 Patients who presented with perianal abscess, 14 (9.3%) developed fistula or had already developed a fistula [19-21]. This resembles previous studies done worldwide where they found that incidence of an anal fistula developing from an anal abscess ranges from 15 to 38 percent [22,23]. Further detailed studies need to be done to identify and prevent the risk factors that might instigate formation of fistulas after drainage of perianal abscesses [24].

Limitations

Some of the patients might have developed fistula and went for treatment otherwise/did not receive treatment. The data for this study was taken from the hospital electronic database of operations. Some cases may not have been recorded electronically due to different issues and handwritten on patient notes. These cases may have been missed during data collection. Last but not least, the impact of COVID-19 pandemic needs considerable consideration.

REFERENCES

  1. Abcarian H (2011) Anorectal infection: abscess-fistula. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24: 14.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice. Can J Surg 41: 252-253.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Begum N, Ahmed QSU (2016) Incidence of Anal Fistula and Recurrent Abscesses. Following Management of Perianal Abscess. J Armed Forces Med Coll 12: 26-29.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H, Tan AB (1984) Perianal abscesses and fistulas: A study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 27: 593.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Hämäläinen KP, Sainio AP (1998) Incidence of fistulas after drainage of acute anorectal abscesses. DisColon Rectum 41:1357.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Hamadan A, Haigh PI, Liu IL, Abbas MA  (2009) Who is at risk for developing chronic anal fistula or recurrent anal sepsis after initial perianal abscess? Dis Colon Rectum 52:217.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  13. Sahnan K, Askari A, Adegbola SO (2017) Natural history of anorectal sepsis. Br J Surg 104:1857.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  15. Sahnan K, Askari A, Adegbola SO (2019) Persistent Fistula after Anorectal Abscess Drainage: Local Experience of 11 Years. Dis Colon Rectum 62: 327.
  16. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  17. Sainio P (1984) Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann ChirGynaecol 73: 219.
  18. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  19. Boileau Grant JC (1972) Perineum and pelvis. In: An Atlas of Anatomy, the Williams and Wilkins Co. BaLtimore.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref

  21. Large Intestine (2008) In Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26: 2703-2704.
  22. Google Scholar, Crossref

  23. Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, Laméris JS (2000) Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age- and sexrelated Variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 217: 395.
  24. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  25. Sahni VA, Burling D (2009) Imaging of anorectal fistula. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 20: 2.
  26. Google Scholar, Crossref

  27. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD (1996) anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39: 723.
  28. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  29. Włodarczyk M, Włodarczyk J, Sobolewska-Włodarczyk A, Trzciński R, Dziki Ł, et al. (2021) Current Concepts in the pathogenesis of cryptoglandular perianal fistula. J Int Med Res 49: 300060520986669.
  30. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  31. Abramowitz L, Soudan D, Souffran M (2016) the outcome of fistulotomy for anal fistula at 1 year: a prospective multicentre French study. Colorectal Dis 18: 279.
  32. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  33. Rizzo JA, Naig AL, Johnson EK (2010) Anorectal abscess and fistula-in-ano: evidence-based management. Surg Clin North Am 90: 45.
  34. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  35. Holzheimer RG, Siebeck M (2006) Treatment procedures for anal fistulous cryptoglandular abscess--how to get the best results. Eur J Med Res 11: 501.
  36. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  37. Shanwani A, Nor AM, Amri N (2010) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphinctersaving technique for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 53:39.
  38. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  39. Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J 3rd, Hyman N (2005) Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1337.
  40. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  41. Ho YH, Tan M, Chui CH, (1997) Randomized controlled trial of primary fistulotomy with drainage Alone for perianal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum 40: 1435.
  42. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  43. Hall JF, Bordeianou L, Hyman N (2014) Outcomes after operations for anal fistula: results of a prospective, multicenter, regional study. Dis Colon Rectum 57: 1304.
  44. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  45. Abramowitz L, Soudan D, Souffran M (2016) the outcome of fistulotomy for anal fistula at 1 year: a prospective multicentre French study. Colorectal Dis 18: 279.
  46. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  47. Zollinger RM, Zollinger Jr RM (1983) Plate CXCVII: Drainage of ischiorectal abscess - Excision of fistula in ano. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 20: 102-109.
  48. Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation: Garsaa T, Rahman KR, Olphert S (2022) Incidence of Development of Perianal Fistula after Perianal Abscess Surgery. J Uni Sur, Vol. 10 No. 10: 70.