Flyer

Journal of FisheriesSciences.com

  • Journal h-index: 32
  • Journal CiteScore: 28.03
  • Journal Impact Factor: 24.27
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Academic Journals Database
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • The Global Impact Factor (GIF)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Proquest Summons
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • Advanced Science Index
  • International committee of medical journals editors (ICMJE)
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • J-Gate
  • Chemical Abstract
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • ResearchGate
  • University of Barcelona
Share This Page

Special Issue Article - (2021) Volume 0, Issue 0

Mini Review on Managing Fishponds to Climate-Proof the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site, and Implications for the East Asian-Australasian Flyway

Eric Wikramanayake1*, Carmen Or1, Felipe Costa2, Xianji Wen1, Fion Cheung1 and Aurélie Shapiro3

1Conservation Programme, Worldwide Fund for Nature-Hong-Kong, Hong Kong, China

2Worldwide Fund for Nature-Germany, Berlin, Germany

3Here+There Mapping Solutions, Berlin, Germany

*Corresponding Author:
Eric Wikramanayake
Conservation Programme
Worldwide Fund for Nature-Hong-Kong
Hong Kong, China
E-mail: ericw@wwf.org.hk

Received date: 08.02.2021; Accepted date: 22.02.2021; Published date: 01.03.2021

Visit for more related articles at Journal of FisheriesSciences.com

Abstract

Coastal wetlands are important stepping stones and wintering sites for migratory birds along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF). But wetlands are being extensively converted throughout Southeast and East Asia, and continued loss can disrupt the long-distance migrations, and result in species population declines and extirpations. Wetlands are also under threat from global climate change; sea level rise can inundate coastal wetlands, and the two forces of coastal development and climate change can subject the remaining wetlands to coastal squeeze. Therefore important wetlands along the flyway should be assessed for the impacts of climate change to implement proactive climate adaptation strategies. The Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar site in Hong Kong is an important staging and wintering site along the EAAF. A climate model for this wetland showed that by 2100 some of the wetlands and mudflats used by migratory birds could become inundated. In the future, under climate change scenarios, fishponds further inland, now within the ‘wise-use’ compartment of the Ramsar site, could represent supratidal wetlands for migratory birds. Therefore, these fishponds should be maintained and managed without the threat of conversion by providing economic incentives for fishpond operators. This analysis represents a case study for climate proofing the EAAF by engaging fishpond owners and operators for sustained management of coastal fishponds as an integrated approach for wetland management that includes aquaculture, sustainable livelihoods, bird habitat conservation, and climate-proofing coastal areas.

Keywords

Mai Po; Ramsar; Hong Kong; Migratory birds; East Asian-Australasian Flyway; Water birds

Introduction

Coastal wetlands are important stepping stones and wintering sites for migratory birds that use the East Asian- Australasian Flyway (EAAF) [1-4]. But these wetlands are being extensively and rapidly converted throughout Southeast and East Asia for development [5]; for example, over 65% of the intertidal mudflats in the Yellow Sea, one of the more important staging areas along the flyway, have been lost in recent decades [6]. Continued loss can disrupt the migration that has evolved over millennia, and species population declines and extirpations. But these wetlands are also under threat from global climate change and its consequences, notably sea level rise (SLR) and extreme storms that are accompanied by stronger wave and tidal surges [7,8]. The two forces of coastal development and climate change can subject the remaining wetlands to coastal squeeze [9-11]. Thus, important, existing wetlands along the flyway should be assessed for the impacts of climate change to plan and implement proactive climate adaptation strategies. These analyses should be conducted at site scales to identify site-scale conservation strategies based on habitat availability, current and planned landuse, and restoration opportunities before options for conservation and restoration disappear.

The Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar site in Hong Kong (Figure 1) is one such important staging and wintering site along the EAAF. Rising sea levels and stronger storm surges expected with climate change [12,13] and shrinking mudflats because of declining coastal nourishment caused by upstream sediment trapping [14] can combine to decrease the availability of these coastal habitats for the waterbirds in Mai Po in the future. In order to inform a climate adaptation plan for the Ramsar site, Wikramanayake et al. [15] modelled the impacts of climate change and decreasing sedimentation rates on the important bird habitats in the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar site. The authors used the SLAMM (Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model) version 6.7 [16] to simulate habitat conversion under selected sea-level rise scenarios for coastal areas in the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar site and the adjacent areas.

fisheriessciences

Figure 1A: Is the locator map for the Mai Po inner deep bay Ramsar site in relation to the deep bay. The Shenzhen River borders the northern boundary of the Wetland conservation area.

fisheriessciences-habitat

Figure 1B: Shows the major habitat types used in the SLAMM analysis.

Literature Review

Model outputs

The model outputs indicate no significant impact to the habitats in Mai Po until after 2075, but the 2100 projection shows an overall impact on the mangroves, marshes and tidal flats. Under a conservative 1.5 m sea level rise (SLR) scenario, at low tide there was little change in the tidal mudflats and coastal mangroves if the current accretion levels of 8 mm/yr or more continues into the future (Figures 2 and 3). However, if accretion levels decrease to 4 mm/yr, as expected because of sediment trapping behind major dams on the Pearl River [14], the tidal flats are expected to be inundated even during low tide, with over 77% being lost as habitat for wading and shorebirds (Figures 2 and 3). Mangroves, however, will remain relatively unaffected. If accretion levels drop to 2 mm/yr >50% of the coastal mangroves could be lost because of permanent inundation of the coastal areas, even during low tide. Under the high tide scenarios, with 1.5 m SLR, over half of the regularly flooded marshes inside the nature reserve will also be inundated even with an 8 mm/yr accretion rate and less (Figures 2 and 4).

Under a more extreme 2 m SLR scenario, during low tide, there could be 77% and 57% loss of tidal flats and coastal mangroves, respectively, with an 8 mm/yr accretion rate (Figures 2 and 3). The regularly flooded marshes in the nature reserve will also lose 56% of area. During high tide most of the marshes, mangroves, and tidal flats will be underwater (Figure 4).

fisheriessciences

Figure 2: Changes to wetland habitats in the Mai Po inner deep bay Ramsar Site under 1.5 and 2 m sea level rise (SLR) scenarios and different sediment accretion rates in the offshore mudflats as projected by the SLAMM. Percent losses are given for low and high tide. Projection is for 2100.

fisheriessciences

Figure 3: Climate model outputs for low tide changes to habitats under 1.5 m sea level rise and 15 mm, 8 mm, 4 mm and 2 mm/year accretion rates by 2100.

fisheriessciences

Figure 4: Climate model outputs for high tide changes to habitats under 1.5 m sea level rise and 15 mm, 8 mm, 4 mm and 2 mm/year accretion rates by 2100.

Discussion

As an important steppingstone and wintering wetland for waterbirds along the EAAF, Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar site represents a case study of how impacts of climate change and sea level rise can affect the coastal wetlands along the EAAF. The 1,500 ha Ramsar site is comprised of tidal mudflats, coastal mangroves, marshes, and fishponds with a 380 ha nature reserve zoned as a core area (Figure 1). Currently there are several active, commercial fishponds that surround the nature reserve, in an area designated as a Wetland Conservation Area (Figure 1). As part of the wise-use compartment of the Ramsar Site, these fishponds are meant to add ecological value to the nature reserve while providing sustainable livelihoods to the pond operators from the local communities.

But the climate model analysis shows that much of the existing wetland habitats in the nature reserve and tidal flats could become unavailable by the end of the century even under conservative projections of change, reduce the capacity of the Ramsar site to support the numbers of waterbirds that currently use it. The climate model also shows that some fishponds in the Ramsar site will be relatively less impacted by SLR (Figures 3 and 4). Managing these fishponds, rather than converting them to other land uses, should be a climate change adaptation strategy for Mai Po, since they would represent the wetland habitats for birds under future climate change scenarios. With the conversion of natural wetlands to fishponds, even now the latter serve as supratidal habitats for waterbirds during high tide in many stopover sites and wintering areas across the flyway [17]. But most of these fishponds are privately owned and operated. With increasing price competition for pond fisheries, the operators are beginning to abandon maintenance and management of fish ponds. Without the necessary management, the fishponds can be overgrown with reeds and sedges, and eventually undergo natural succession into dry lands.

The relevance to the flyway

Mai Po is only one steppingstone along the vast flyway.

There are hundreds of other such wetlands that are also threatened by encroaching infrastructure and climate change [4,6,18,19]. Strategically located wetlands are essential steppingstones to make the flyway functional for bird migrations [2-4]. Therefore, we recommend that this analysis be applied to other wetlands that serve as important staging or wintering sites along the EAAF to inform flyway-scale climate adaptation strategies that will enable the migrations to persist.

Wetlands are important for more than bird migrations.

Coastal ecosystems are among the most productive and important ecosystems in the world [20]. But they are being extensively converted to other anthropogenic land uses in Hong Kong and throughout the region [6]. In addition to supporting high biodiversity and being important to support bird migrations, they also provide a range of ecosystem goods and services, including reducing flooding, protecting shorelines from wave and tidal surges expected from severe weather events due to climate change [21]. Therefore, climate-smart land use strategies that prevent the conversion of wetlands and promote effective management of supra tidal artificial wetlands can increase coastal resilience and reduce the vulnerability of coastal communities and infrastructure from the consequences of SLR and storms [21-27].

Conclusion

In the Greater Bay Area of the Pearl River, rapid economic development and population growth over the past four decades have resulted in extensive conversion and fragmentation of natural coastal habitats. Thus, forwardlooking, proactive land-use planning to conserve the existing coastal wetlands and preventing further conversion as an integrated climate response can be facilitated and informed by similar climate impact analyses at scale. However, this should happen now, before available options become lost to the coastal squeeze of anthropogenic drivers of land use change and SLR from the landward and seaward sides, respectively.

35436

References

  1. Li J, Hughes AC, Dudgeon D (2019) Mapping wader biodiversity along the East Asian-Australasian flyway. PlOS One 14: e0215877.
  2. Xia S, Yu X, Millington S, Liu Y, Jia Y, et al. (2017) Identifying priority sites and gaps for the conservation of migratory waterbirds in China's coastal wetlands. Biological Conservation 210: 72-82.
  3. Xu Y, Si Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Prins HH, et al. (2019) Loss of functional connectivity in migration networks induces population decline in migratory birds. Ecological Applications 29: e01960.
  4. Yang H, Ma M, Thompson JR, Flower RJ (2017) Protect coastal wetlands in China to save endangered migratory birds. Proc N Academy of Sci 114: E5491- E5492.
  5. Murray NJ, Phinn SR, DeWitt M, Ferrari R, Johnston R, et al. (2018) The global distribution and trajectory of tidal flats. Nature 565: 222.
  6. MacKinnon J, Verkuil YI, Murray N (2012) IUCN situation analysis on East and Southeast Asian intertidal habitats, with particular reference to the Yellow Sea (including the Bohai Sea). Occasional paper of the IUCN species survival commission 47.
  7. Melville DS (1997) Threats to waders along the east Asian-Australasian flyway. Shorebird Conser Asia-Pacific Region 15-34.
  8. Nicholls RJ, Cazenave A (2007) Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328: 1517-20.
  9. Schuerch M, Spencer T, Temmerman S, Kirwan ML, Wolff C, et al. (2018) Future response of global coastal wetlands to sea-level rise. Nature 561: 231-4.
  10. Torio DD, Chmura GL (2013) Assessing coastal squeeze of tidal wetlands. J Coastal Resear 29: 1049-61.
  11. Wu WT, Zhou YX, Tian B (2017) Coastal wetlands facing climate change and anthropogenic activities: A remote sensing analysis and modelling application. Ocean Coast Manag. 138: 1-10.
  12. He YH, Mok HY, Lai ES (2016) Projection of sea-level change in the vicinity of Hong Kong in the 21st century. Internl J Climatology 36: 3237-44.
  13. Lee BY, Wong WT, Woo WC (2010) Sea-level rise and storm surge-impacts of climate change on Hong Kong. InHKIE civil div conf 12-14.
  14. Ranasinghe R, Wu CS, Conallin J, Duong TM, Anthony EJ (2019) Disentangling the relative impacts of climate change and human activities on fluvial sediment supply to the coast by the world’s large rivers: Pearl River Basin, China. Scientific Reports 9236.
  15. Wikramanayake E, Or C, Costa F, Wen X, Cheung F, et al. (2021) A climate adaptation strategy for Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar site: Steppingstone to climate proofing the East Asian-Australasian Flyway. PlOs One 15: e0239945.
  16. Clough J, Park R, Marco P (2016) Sea level affecting marshes model, Version 6.7 Technical Documentation. Warren Pinnacle Consulting, Waitsfield, VT.
  17. Jackson MV, Carrasco LR, Choi CY, Li J, Ma Z, et al. (2019) Multiple habitat use by declining migratory birds necessitates joined-up conservation. Ecology and Evolution 9: 2505-15.
  18. Luo S, Shao D, Long W, Liu Y, Sun T, et al. (2018) Assessing ‘coastal squeeze’of wetlands at the Yellow River Delta in China: A case study. Ocean Coast Manag. 153: 193-202.
  19. Szabo JK, Battley PF, Buchanan KL, Rogers DI (2016) What does the future hold for shorebirds in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway? Emu 116: 95-9.
  20. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-60.
  21. Costanza R, Pérez-Maqueo O, Martinez ML, Sutton P, Anderson SJ, et al. (2008) The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection. AMBIO 37: 241-248.
  22. Michener WK, Blood ER, Bildstein KL, Brinson MM, Gardner LR (1997) Climate change, hurricanes and tropical storms, and rising sea level in coastal wetlands. Ecological Applications 7: 770-801.
  23. Barbier EB (2015) Valuing the storm protection service of estuarine and coastal ecosystems. Ecosystem Ser 11: 32-38.
  24. Gedan KB, Kirwan ML, Wolanski E, Barbier EB, Silliman BR (2011) The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: Answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Climatic Change 106: 7-29
  25. Smolders S, Plancke Y, Ides S, Meire P, Temmerman S (2015) Role of intertidal wetlands for tidal and storm tide attenuation along a confined estuary: A model study. Natural Hazar Earth Sys Sci 15: 1659-75.
  26. Sun F, Carson RT (2020) Coastal wetlands reduce property damage during tropical cyclones. Proc Nationl Academy Sci 117: 5719-5725.
  27. Chan FK, Mitchell G, Adekola O, McDonald A (2012) Flood risk in Asia’s urban mega-deltas: Drivers, impacts and response. Envir Urbanztn ASIA 3: 41-61.