Image - (2015) Volume 3, Issue 4
| Anthony Kallas Chemaly1*, Fouad Aoun2,Alexandre Peltier2,Maroun Moukarzel3 and Henri Steyaert1 |
| Corresponding Author: Alexandre Peltier,Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Universit? libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.Tel: 32 2 541 31 11E-mail: alexandre.peltier@bordet.be |
| Received: November 12, 2015; Accepted: November 16, 2015; Published: November 24, 2015 |
| Related article at Pubmed, Scholar Google |
The presence of a renal agenesis with an ipsilateral seminal vesicle cyst and an ejaculatory duct obstruction is a rare congenital anomaly initially reported by Zinner in 1914. This anomaly can be responsible of perineal pain, hemospermia, hematuria, post-ejaculatory pain, urinary tract infection, infertility and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
| The presence of a renal agenesis with an ipsilateral seminal vesicle cyst and an ejaculatory duct obstruction is a rare congenital anomaly initially reported by Zinner in 1914 [1]. This anomaly can be responsible of perineal pain, hemospermia, hematuria, post-ejaculatory pain, urinary tract infection, infertility and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). | ||
| It is well established that in case of symptomatology, surgery is the treatment of choice. Herein, we present a case of a laparoscopic en bloc resection of the left kidney, ureter and seminal vesicle in a 17 years old boy presenting a variant of Zinner syndrome with the left ureter draining in the ipsilateral seminal vesicle. The diagnosis was made by an abdominopelvic MRI after persistent fever and LUTS (Figure 1). | ||
Discussion |
||
| Various techniques have been proposed for the operative management of patients with Zinner syndrome. | ||
| Open resection for young fit patient and transurethral resection as well as transrectal aspiration for unfit patients have been proposed and different approaches such as transvesical, transperineal, transperitoneal, retroperitoneal and transcoccygeal approaches have been described [2]. | ||
| However, these approaches are challenging and associated with a high risk of morbidity [3]. The difficulty stems mainly from the deep location of the seminal vesicle in the retrovesical region. Additionally, open access demands a large incision with extensive dissection of the bladder and exposes the patient to the risk of erectile dysfunction and rectal injury. Furthermore, some of these approaches are limited by the inability to treat upper urinary tract anomalies. | ||
| Recently, several authors had reported their experience with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach to treat patients with Zinner syndrome [4,5]. | ||
| In our case, laparoscopic approach has been associated with minimal blood loss, quick convalescence, minimal postoperative pain and a good cosmetic result. | ||
| In our opinion, due to the complex anomalies encountered in this syndrome, laparoscopic transperitoneal approach should be the gold standard for treating these patients. | ||
| It allows direct access to the kidney, ureter and seminal vesicle by only incising the peritoneum. A fine and precise dissection and a good view would limit the blood loss, avoid damage to the bladder, rectum and neurovascular bundles. | ||
| We recommend always a multiplanar MRI before the surgery for evaluating the local extent of these seminal vesicle anomalies and to delineate the pathway of the ureter. | ||
Figures at a glance |
||
|
||
