Flyer

Journal of Neurology and Neuroscience

  • ISSN: 2171-6625
  • Journal h-index: 18
  • Journal CiteScore: 4.35
  • Journal Impact Factor: 3.75
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • The Global Impact Factor (GIF)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Proquest Summons
  • Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF)
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
Share This Page

Case Report - (2024) Volume 15, Issue 4

Neurofibromatosis type 1, case report of surgical treatment of cervical c2 kissing neurofibromas

Marcel Sincari1*, Francisco Cabrita2, Eduardo Mendes3 and Mark Sincari4
 
1Department of Surgery, Centro Hospitalar, Tondela-Viseu, Portugal
2Department of Surgery, CUF Viseu Hospital, Viseu, Portugal
3Department of Surgery, Centro Hospitalar, Ortopedy, Viseu, Portugal
4Department of Medicine, University of Coimbra, FMUC, Coimbra, Portugal
 
*Correspondence: Marcel Sincari, Department of Surgery, Centro Hospitalar, Tondela-Viseu, Portugal, Email:

Received: 23-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. ipjnn-24-15068; Editor assigned: 25-Jul-2024, Pre QC No. P-15068; Reviewed: 14-Aug-2024, QC No. Q-15068; Revised: 20-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. R-15068; Published: 26-Aug-2024

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is an autosomal dominant genetic syndrome associated with numerous neoplastic and non-neoplastic manifestations affecting a variety of organ systems, including skin, eye, nervous system, skeleton and endocrine and gastrointestinal tract. The diagnosis and clinical course of this disease is associated with a variety of different challenges. Postoperative management of surgically treated cases is even more difficult. We present a case of a young lady with NF1 with kissing NFBs of C2 root with severe cervical spine compression and signs of myelopathy treated surgically. The postoperative period was practically the follow up of complications and addressing them. The final result is very good and the overall follow up was 5 years.

Keywords

Neurofibroma; Myelopathy; Laminectomy

Acronyms

NF1: Neurofibromatosis type 1; NFBs: Neurofibromas; ACDF: Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion; CSF: Cerebrospinal Fluid

Introduction

The earliest descriptions of NF can be seen in Egypt papyrus of Ebers in 1500 before Christ, as well in artistic crops like Hellenistic statuette dated in 323 before Christ. More recent artistic descriptions are mosaic illustration of Ulise Aldrovandis, Monstrum Historia in 1592. The Quasimodo in the Victor Hugo´s novel Notre-Dame de Paris, published in 1832, is though that has NF [1]. One year later after Victor Hugo had published his Notre-Dame de Paris, in 1833, Friedrich Daniel von Recklinghausen (Virchow´s pupil) was born and had the first official interpretation of NF1 as an illness in 1882 on a report “On multiple cutaneous fibromas and their relationship with multiple neuromas” he was the first to name the tumors neurofibromas [2]. NF1 is estimated to occur in 1:3,000 live births. It is extremely variable in its clinical presentation from generalized expression of the disease (90% of the cases) [3] to localized neurofibromas or café-au-lait spots [4]. According to another sources NF1 incidence is estimated of 1 in 2,700 and a prevalence of 1 in 4,500 [3].

NF1 represents monogenic disorders presenting a pattern of autosomal dominant inheritance, with a high rate of de novo mutations of 42%. These mutations are believed to be responsible for the sporadic appearance of NF1 [5]. Penetrance is complete or, at least, nearly so before the age of 5 years, but expressivity differs greatly between affected individuals, even within the same consanguinity. There is no predilection for sex, race, or ethnicity [6,7]. NF1 is the most common tumor predisposition syndrome inherited in an autosomal dominant (100% penetrance) fashion with a wide variety of expressivity [8]. The lifetime risk of malignancy in individuals with NF1 is estimated to be 59.6% [9], justifying the lifelong surveillance of patients with NF1 [10].

The diagnostic criteria for NF1 were defined in 1987 by the National Institute of Health Criteria Consensus Conference:

• Six or more spots of “cafe au lait” type more than 5 mm in diameter,

• Two or more neurofibromas or one plexiform neurofibroma,

• Freckles or skin discolorations in the places inaccessible for light (armpits, groins, pubic region),

• Two or more Lisch nodules on the iris,

• Characteristic skeletal changes,

• A first-degree relative suffering from NF13.

At least two criteria must be met for clinical diagnosis [11].

Characteristic skeletal changes of NF1 include congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia, scoliosis, sphenoid wing dysplasia, rib penciling, and gracile bones [12]. Scoliosis can be considered the most common type of spinal deformity that it is present in 10% to 71% of cases [13]. According to another authors, spine deformities in NF1 including scoliosis, kyphosis and atlantoaxial instability are in 2-36% of the patients [14].

Malignant transformation leads to the development of such tumors as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, or malignant triton tumor. Other soft tissue sarcomas, like rhabdomyosarcoma, as well as other malignancies such as juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia or pheochromocytoma are also encountered in NF1 patients with increased frequency comparing to general population [15,16]. In spite of this, in 1992, the participants of a joint World Health Organization and National Neurofibromatosis Foundation meeting declared that “although some clinicians have advocated routine screening scans for all patients with NF1, the utility of such screening has not been conclusively demonstrated” [17]. According to some sources, taking into account the rarity of complications that are usually symptomatic and easily detected during the clinical follow-up, screening investigations are not recommended [15-18]. Positron emission tomography/ computed tomography are useful for the detection of malignant transformation of tumors in NF1 patients [19].

Case Presentation

34 years old lady, with NF1 diagnosed since the age of 18 years, admitted because of unstable gait. MRI revealed bilateral kissing C2 roots tumors with severe bilateral compression of the spinal cord, spinal cord is squeezed in between C2 bilateral tumors and C3 root left sided tumor Fig. 1. She was operated on, the extra and intradural growing tumors were removed through C2, C3 laminectomy with subsequent dural reconstruction with nuchal ligament harvest during the approach. In the postoperative period she developed a huge, tense, subaponeurotic CSF collection Fig. 2. solved only after inserting the ventriculoperitoneal shunt with the use of navigation, because of small ventricles Fig. 3. Two years after the neurofibroma removal she was bothered by neck pain and fixed position in anterior flexion of the head. X-Ray, MRI diagnosed post laminectomy regional kyphosis C2-C3 with anterior luxation. She was selected for circumferential arthrodesis (ACDF C3-C4, C4-C5, posterior mass lateral fixation C2-C6 on the right side, C2, C3, C5, C6 on the left side) with good recovery and pain relief Fig. 4. Three years after she started to be bothered by upper limb paresthesia and MRI revealed initial cervical syringomyelia. One year later her gait was progressively more unstable and MRI showed significant syringomyelia progression Fig. 5. And next surgery was performed: siringopleural shunt insertion trough upper thoracic laminectomy Th1, Th2 and unilateral intralaminar fixation C7-Th3 was performed at the end of the surgery Fig 6. The decision to fix C7-Th3 with intralaminar unilateral screws was dictated by previous experience with cervical instability and weak muscles of the patient. The cranial hand of the proximal T shaped shunt is placed inside the syrinx cavity and the caudal part was positioned in the subdural space Fig. 7. The distal part was inserted in the pleural space through the intercostal space. The postoperative period was uneventful, the gait improved significantly. The patient follow-up until now is 5 years, she is doing well with very few unspecific complaints. She is seen annually by neurosurgeon and neurologist Fig. 8.

neurology-neuroscience-bilateral-spine

Fig. 1: MRI revealing bilateral C2 root tumor with severe bilateral spine cord compression and C3 unilateral tumor.

neurology-neuroscience-meningocele

Fig. 2: MRI and CT scan showing huge, postoperative pseudo meningocele, no signs of hydrocephalus, no signs of residual tumors.

neurology-neuroscience-meningocele

Fig. 3: Serial CT scan after ventriculoperitoneal shunting, meningocele diminished on serial CT scan.

neurology-neuroscience-laminectomy

Fig. 4: MRI revealing upper cervical post laminectomy regional kyphosis, syringomyelia, no signs of meningocele. X-Ray before and after 360-degree arthrodesis.

neurology-neuroscience-syringomyelia

Fig. 5: Serial MRI with 1-year time difference, showing syringomyelia progression to upper thoracic spine cord.

neurology-neuroscience-syringomyelia

Fig. 6: CT scan, X-Ray after syringopleural shunting.

neurology-neuroscience-syrinx-cavity

Fig. 7: Intraoperative picture, the cranial hand of the proximal part of T shaped shunt is placed inside the syrinx cavity and the caudal part is positioned in the subdural space.

neurology-neuroscience-siringo-pleural

Fig. 8: MRI 1 year after siringo-pleural shunting, reveal no intramedullary cavity.

Discussion

The most common tumor found in NF1 patients are NFBs, followed by plexiform NFBs, malignant peripheric nerve sheath tumors, and glial tumors [20]. Contrary to NF2, the tumors are less frequently found in the intradural spinal compartment in NF1 (less than10% of the cases), with most of them located laterally to the neuroforamina [21].

Sometimes, like in the case described here, NFBs are found bilaterally in two nerve roots at the same spinal level, resulting in significant cord compression. These lesions are known as “kissing neurofibromas”, generally with progressive myelopathy in the cervical spine, usually with surgical indication to relieve cord compression. In the literature is mentioned that decompressive procedures in the cervical spine in NF1 patients will ultimately cause some degree of deformity, even in adult patients [22], like what happened in our case.

The best treatment of malignant peripheric nerve tumors is complete excision. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy have unclear success rates. Neurofibromatosis-1 patients with MPNSTs have a 5-year survival rate of approximately 21% [23]. Hydrocephalus may be an unexpected postsurgical sequela in these patients [24]. The subaponeurotic CSF collection after removal of C2 tumors in our opinion is like external hydrocephalus that regressed only after ventriculoperitoneal shunting [25-27].

Conclusion

Despite our wide knowledge concerning NF1 there are still numerous clinical and surgical challenges to be solved. Surgery is the principal line of treatment for neurofibromas, but comes with a high recurrence rate after partial removal of large plexiform neurofibromas. In the case of NF1- related tumors, there is no consensus with regard to the treatment strategy due to the multiple pathways involved in the growth of NF1 tumors. More relevant spinal complications of NF1 include pseudarthrosis, bleeding, hematoma formation. Progression of the deformity may also be observed, as well as, dural leaks. Based on a group of 22 patients treated surgically, in retrospective analysis, it was concluded that early stabilization of the cervical spine prevents late deformity of the patients with NF1. In our case we experienced almost all possible complications, more relevant being CSF flow disturbances, huge tense subaponeurotic collection solved with shunting and progressive syringomyelia, in spite of good functioning of ventriculoperitoneal shunt, that was resolved with siringopleural shunting. Another major complication was cervical post-laminectomy kyphosis that could be avoided if initial fixation would be done at the first surgery. These emphasize that preoperative planning and meticulous follow up of the surgically treated patient’s withnNF1 is an important issue that improves life quality.

Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Ruggieri M, Praticò AD, Caltabiano R, et al. Early history of the different forms of neurofibromatosis from ancient Egypt to the British Empire and beyond: first descriptions, medical curiosities, misconceptions, landmarks, and the persons behind the syndromes. Am J Med Genet A. 2018; 176(3):515-50.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Violante IR. The neurobiological basis of Neurofibromatosis type I: new insights into brain structure, function and neurochemistry. (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de Coimbra (Portugal)). 2012. 
  4. Google Scholar

  5. Riccardi VM. Von Recklinghausen Neurofibromatosis. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305(27):1617–1627.
  6. Google Scholar   

  7. Roth RR, Martines R, James WD. Segmental neurofibromatosis. Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(7):917-20.
  8. Google Scholar   

  9. Evans DG, Howard E, Giblin C, et al. Birth incidence and prevalence of tumor-prone syndromes: estimates from a UK family genetic register service. Am J Med Genet A. 2010; 152A:327-32.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Friedman JM. Epidemiology of neurofibromatosis type 1. Am J Med Genet. 1999; 89: 1-6.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  13. Antonio JR, Goloni-Bertollo EM, Tridico LA. Neurofibromatosis: chronological history and current issues. An Bras Dermatol. 2013; 88: 329-43.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  15. Choi J, An S, Lim SY. Current concepts of neurofibromatosis type 1: pathophysiology and treatment. Arch Craniofacial Surg. 2022;23(1):6-16.
  16. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  17. Uusitalo E, Rantanen M, Kallionpaa RA, et al. Distinctive cancer associations in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:1978-86.
  18. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  19. Ly KI, Blakeley JO. The diagnosis and management of neurofibromatosis type 1. Med Clin North Am. 2019; 103(6): 1035-54.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  21. Stumpf DA, Alksne JF, Annegers JF, et al. Conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Arch Neurol. 1988; 45(575):8.
  22. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  23. Schindeler A, Little DG. Recent insights into bone development, homeostasis, and repair in type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1). Bone. 2008; 42(4):616-22.
  24. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  25. Haddadi K, Kargar Soleiman Abad S, Hashemie Amir SM, et al. Spinal Manifestations of Neurofibromatosis: An Update. Iran J Neurosurg. 2020; 6(4):169-80.
  26. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  27. Lykissas MG, Mavrogenis AF, Megaloikonomos PD, et al. Spinal deformities in neurofibromatosis type 1. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2018;15(3):348-352.
  28. Google Scholar

  29. Evans DG, Salvador H, Chang VY, et al. Cancer and central nervous system tumor surveillance in pediatric neurofibromatosis 1. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23(12):e46-53.
  30. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  31. Bekiesińska-Figatowska M, Brągoszewska H, Duczkowski M, et al. Circle of Willis abnormalities in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2014; 48(1):15-20.
  32. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  33. World Health Organization. Prevention and control of neurofibromatosis: memorandum from a joint WHO/NNFF meeting. Bull World Health Organ. (WHO). 1992:173-82.
  34. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  35. Pinson S, Créange A, Barbarot S, et al. Neurofibromatosis 1: recommendations for management. Arch Pediatr. 2002; 9(1): 49-60.
  36. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  37. Moharir M, London K, Howman-Giles R, et al. Utility of positron emission tomography for tumour surveillance in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010; 37:1309-17.
  38. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  39. Shimizu T, Lenke LG, Cerpa M, et al. Preoperative halo-gravity traction for treatment of severe adult kyphosis and scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2020; 8:85-95.
  40. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  41. Shofty B, Barzilai O, Khashan M, et al. Spinal manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 1. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020; 36(10):2401-2408.
  42. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  43. Taleb FS, Guha A, Arnold PM, et al. Surgical management of cervical spine manifestations of neurofibromatosis Type 1: long-term clinical and radiological follow-up in 22 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14(3):356-66.
  44. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  45. Le LQ, Shipman T, Burns DK, Parada LF. Cell of origin and microenvironment contribution for NF1-associated dermal neurofibromas. Cell Stem Cell. 2009; 4(5):453-63.
  46. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  47. Shofty B, Mauda-Havakuk M, Ben-Sira L, et al. Surgical management of “kissing” spinal plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type 1 patients. World Neurosurg. 2020; 1(134):e1143-7.
  48. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  49. TrovoMarqui AB, Tajara EH. Neurofibromin: a general outlook. Clin Genet 2006; 70(1):1-3.
  50. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  51. Katz D, Lazar A, Lev D. Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumour (MPNST): the clinical implications of cellular signalling pathways. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2009; 11:e30.
  52. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  53. Crawford AH, Lykissas MG, Schorry EK, et al. Neurofibromatosis: etiology, commonly encountered spinal deformities, common complications and pitfalls of surgical treatment. Spine Deform. 2012; 1(1):85-94.
  54. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at