Flyer

Health Science Journal

  • ISSN: 1791-809X
  • Journal h-index: 61
  • Journal CiteScore: 17.30
  • Journal Impact Factor: 18.23
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • CINAHL Complete
  • Scimago
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • EMCare
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
Share This Page

Commentary - (2023) Volume 17, Issue 5

Physical Activity Gender-Sex Differences: A Decoding Approach

Hainrich Hertz*
 
Department of Health Science and Medicine, Netherlands
 
*Correspondence: Hainrich Hertz, Department of Health Science and Medicine, Netherlands, Email:

Received: 28-Apr-2023, Manuscript No. iphsj-23-13787; Editor assigned: 01-May-2023, Pre QC No. iphsj-23-13787 (PQ); Reviewed: 15-May-2023, QC No. iphsj-23-13787; Revised: 22-May-2023, Manuscript No. iphsj-23-13787(R); Published: 30-May-2023, DOI: 10.36648/1791- 809X.17.5.1024

Abstract

The gender-sex differentiation of physical activity refers to the variations in participation, preferences, and performance in physical activities based on societal expectations, physiological differences, and individual choices related to gender and sex. This differentiation is influenced by cultural norms, stereotypes, and gender roles that assign specific activities to men and women. Physiological differences, such as muscle mass, lung capacity, hormone levels, and body composition, also play a role in shaping physical activity patterns. Additionally, gender-specific health considerations guide recommendations for physical activity, with men focusing on cardiovascular health and women prioritizing bone density. Efforts to challenge stereotypes and promote inclusivity are important in breaking down gender barriers and creating equal opportunities for individuals in sports and physical activities. Understanding and addressing the gender-sex differentiation of physical activity can lead to more inclusive and tailored approaches to promote well-being and engage individuals of all genders in a variety of physical activities.

Keywords

Physical activities; Cultural norms; Gender-Sex; Diseases

Introduction

Physical activity is crucial for maintaining good health, boosting overall well-being, and preventing various diseases. While it is widely acknowledged that engaging in regular physical activity is beneficial for both men and women, it is essential to recognize that gender and sex can influence the types of physical activities individuals participate in, as well as the societal expectations and cultural norms that shape these choices. In this article, we will delve into the differentiation of physical activity based on gender and sex, exploring the various factors that contribute to these differences and their implications [1].

Understanding Gender and Sex

Before delving into the differentiation of physical activity based on gender and sex, it is important to establish a clear understanding of these terms. Gender refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women. On the other hand, sex refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that differentiate individuals as male or female [2].

Societal Factors and Gender Roles

Societal factors, including cultural norms and expectations, significantly influence the physical activities individuals choose to engage in. Traditional gender roles often prescribe specific activities and behaviors for men and women, leading to differentiated patterns of physical activity. For instance, sports such as football, basketball, and weightlifting are traditionally associated with masculinity, while activities like dancing, yoga, or aerobics are often seen as more feminine. These gender-based expectations can limit the choices available to individuals and perpetuate stereotypes surrounding physical activity [3-5].

Physiological Differences

While gender roles play a significant role in shaping physical activity preferences, physiological differences between males and females also contribute to differentiated engagement. On average, men tend to have greater muscle mass, larger lung capacity, and higher levels of testosterone, which can enhance their performance in activities requiring strength, power, and speed. Conversely, women tend to have a higher percentage of body fat and wider pelvic structures, which may influence their choices in physical activities. However, it is important to remember that these differences exist on a continuum, and individual variations are common [6].

Health Considerations

Understanding the gender-specific health considerations associated with physical activity is crucial for promoting overall well-being. For example, women's participation in weight-bearing exercises, such as running or resistance training, can help prevent osteoporosis and improve bone density. On the other hand, men may need to focus on cardiovascular activities to reduce the risk of heart disease. Recognizing these differences and tailoring physical activity recommendations accordingly can optimize health outcomes.

Challenging Stereotypes and Promoting Inclusivity

To create a more inclusive and equitable society, it is essential to challenge stereotypes surrounding gender-specific physical activities. Encouraging individuals to participate in activities they enjoy, regardless of societal expectations, can lead to a broader range of physical activities for all. Breaking down gender barriers in sports and promoting equal opportunities for both men and women is also vital in fostering gender equality [7].

Discussion

Physiological differences and individual choices. While it is crucial to acknowledge that there are variations within each gender and sex category, exploring the differentiation helps shed light on the factors that influence physical activity patterns.

Societal Expectations and Gender Roles

One of the key factors influencing the differentiation of physical activity is societal expectations and gender roles. Cultural norms and stereotypes often shape the types of physical activities deemed appropriate for men and women. This can limit the choices available to individuals and perpetuate genderbased expectations. For example, boys are often encouraged to participate in team sports that emphasize strength and competitiveness, while girls may be directed towards activities focused on grace and flexibility. Such expectations can influence the activities individuals are exposed to from an early age and subsequently shape their preferences and engagement in physical activity [8].

Physiological Differences

Physiological differences between males and females can also contribute to the differentiation of physical activity. These differences are rooted in biology and can influence the performance and preferences of individuals. On average, males tend to have higher muscle mass, larger lung capacity, and higher levels of testosterone, which can favor activities requiring strength, power, and speed. Females, on the other hand, often have a higher percentage of body fat, wider pelvic structures, and hormonal differences that can impact their choices in physical activities. It is important to note that these differences exist on a spectrum, and individuals may not conform to these averages [9].

Health Considerations

Considering the gender-specific health considerations associated with physical activity is crucial for promoting well-being. For instance, men may need to focus on cardiovascular activities to reduce the risk of heart disease, while women might prioritize weight-bearing exercises to improve bone density and prevent osteoporosis. Tailoring physical activity recommendations based on these considerations can optimize health outcomes for both genders [10].

Breaking Stereotypes and Promoting Inclusivity

Challenging stereotypes and promoting inclusivity are important steps towards creating a more equitable society in terms of physical activity. Encouraging individuals to participate in activities they enjoy, regardless of societal expectations, can help break down gender barriers. Moreover, promoting equal opportunities for both men and women in sports and physical activities is crucial in fostering gender equality and providing individuals with the freedom to explore their interests and talents.

Moving Forward

Understanding the gender-sex differentiation of physical activity requires a multidimensional approach that takes into account societal expectations, physiological differences, and individual preferences. It is essential to recognize that individuals have diverse interests and capabilities, and their choices in physical activity should not be limited by rigid gender roles. By promoting inclusivity, challenging stereotypes, and providing equal opportunities, we can create a society that embraces a wide range of physical activities for all genders, contributing to improved health and well-being for everyone.

Results

Societal expectations: Cultural norms and gender roles significantly influence the types of physical activities individuals engage in. Society often assigns specific activities and sports to each gender based on stereotypes and expectations. This leads to differentiation in the choices and opportunities available to men and women.

Activity preferences: Studies indicate that men and women tend to show distinct preferences in their choice of physical activities. Men often gravitate towards team sports, weightlifting, and activities that emphasize strength and competitiveness. Women, on the other hand, may prefer activities such as dancing, yoga, and aerobics, which focus on flexibility, grace, and social interaction. These preferences can be influenced by societal expectations and personal interests.

Physiological differences: Biological and physiological differences between males and females can impact their physical activity capabilities and performance. Men generally have higher muscle mass, larger lung capacity, and higher testosterone levels, which can give them advantages in activities that require power, speed, and endurance. Women tend to have higher levels of body fat and wider pelvic structures, which can affect their choices and performance in physical activities. However, it is important to note that individual variations within each gender and sex category are significant, and these differences exist on a continuum.

Health considerations: Gender-specific health considerations play a role in shaping physical activity choices. For instance, women are encouraged to engage in weight-bearing exercises like running or resistance training to improve bone density and prevent osteoporosis. Men may focus on cardiovascular activities to reduce the risk of heart disease. Tailoring physical activity recommendations based on gender-specific health needs can promote better overall well-being.

Breaking Ssereotypes: Efforts to challenge gender stereotypes and promote inclusivity in physical activity have gained momentum. Initiatives that provide equal opportunities and eliminate gender barriers in sports and activities aim to create a more equitable society. By encouraging individuals to participate in activities they enjoy, regardless of societal expectations, we can create a more diverse and inclusive physical activity landscape.

It is important to note that the results may vary across cultures, societies, and individual preferences.

Conclusion

The differentiation of physical activity based on gender and sex is a complex interplay sbetween societal expectations, physiological differences, and individual preferences. Recognizing and understanding these factors can help promote inclusivity, challenge stereotypes, and provide tailored recommendations for individuals based on their unique needs. By fostering an environment that embraces a wide range of physical activities for all genders, we can encourage healthier and happier lives for everyone.

References

  1. Ildiko Roxane Bocskay (2016) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infections in the Eight Service Planning Areas of Los Angeles County Walden University.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Nottasorn P (2012) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Exposure Assessment in Hospital Environment. Epidemiological Science in the University of Michigan 170-181.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Chambers HF, Deleo FR (2009) Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nature reviews. Microbiol 629-41.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Tebelay Dilnessa, Adane Bitew (2016) Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Dis 16:398.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Kitara LD, Anywar AD, Acullu D, Odongo-Aginya E, Aloyo J et al (2011) Antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus in suppurative lesions in Lacor Hospital, Uganda. Afr Health Sci 11:S34-S39.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Akoru C, Kuremu R K, Ndege S Obala A W, Smith, Bartlet M (2016) Prevalence and anti-microbial susceptibility of MRSA at Moi teaching and referral hospital Eldoret, Kenya. J Med Microbiol 6:9-16.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Eyob Y, Yacob B, Oliver O, Daniel G, Robel K et al (2019) Methicillin resistance S. aureus (MRSA) prevalence and Antimicrobial Sensitivity pattern among paients. Amulti-center study in Asmara, Eritrea. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Article ID:8321834.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Rashedul Hasan, Mrityunjoy Acharjee, Rashed Noor (2016) Prevalence of vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) in methicillin resistant S. Aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from burn wound infections. Department of Microbiology, Stamford University Dhaka, 297 Bangladesh; Tzu-Chi Med J 28:49-53.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Goyitom G, Tewelde TG, Araya G/yesus, Tsehay A, Muthupandian S (2016) Prevalence and risk factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization among HIV patients in Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia; Springer plus 5:877.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Francesco Gesualdo (2014) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in a department of paediatrics. Ital J Pediatr 40:3.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation: Hertz H (2023) Physical Activity Gender-Sex Differences: A Decoding Approach. Health Sci J. Vol. 17 No. 5: 1024