Flyer

International Journal of Drug Development and Research

  • ISSN: 0975-9344
  • Journal h-index: 51
  • Journal CiteScore: 46.50
  • Journal Impact Factor: 26.99
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Scimago
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • J-Gate
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • ResearchGate
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Share This Page

Editorial - (2017) Volume 9, Issue 3

Polymeric Micelles for Drug Delivery

Rajesh R Wakaskar*

Research and Development, Insys Therapeutics Inc., Chandler, AZ, USA

*Corresponding Author:

Wakaskar RR
Research and Development
Insys Therapeutics Inc.
Chandler, AZ, USA
Tel: 6175107847
E-mail: rajesh20w@gmail.com

Received Date: September 01, 2017; Accepted Date: September 05, 2017; Published Date: Setember 06, 2017

Citation: Wakaskar RR (2017) Polymeric Micelles for Drug Delivery. Int J Drug Dev & Res 9: 01-02

Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Drug Development and Research

Introduction

Suitable characteristics of the tumor microenvironment and particularly, angiogenesis render the design of optimally tailored polymeric micelles suitable for anti-cancer drug delivery. The conventional chemotherapeutic regimen of highly hydrophobic drugs, which is currently employed, often suffers from several limitations such as inadequate efficacy, poor pharmacokinetic profile, which ultimately results in higher dosage and subsequently causes dose-limiting toxicity [1,2]. Anti-cancer therapy is no longer limited to a single chemotherapeutic drug regime but requires a coordinated interplay amongst clinicians, toxicologists, practitioners, formulation scientists and even biomedical engineers to design systems that can harbor these potent chemotherapeutic drugs in suitable vehicles and deliver them to the intended target sites in optimal concentrations, without causing any toxicity issues [3,4]. During this process, the morphological characteristics or abnormalities that exist within the tumor core and periphery are often exploited to design appropriate polymeric delivery systems that can utilize these conditions adequately and deposit the drug at the intended site of action, preferably with sustained release. Taking this approach further, tumor targeting of these nanoparticulate delivery systems has emerged in the forefront to achieve successful drug delivery with maximum efficacy and minimal toxicity [5,6].

Polymeric micelles are core-shell structures synthesized form amphiphilic block copolymers [7,8]. Various conventional characteristics of these polymeric micelles such as increasing the solubilization of poorly hydrophobic drugs, exhibiting sustained release profile, more importantly, protecting the encapsulated cargo from degradation by various enzymes and even metabolism make them favorable candidates for drug delivery purposes. These micelles are formed when the concentration of the polymer in solution exceeds a certain threshold concentration known as the Critical Micellar Concentration (CMC) and above a certain threshold temperature known as the Critical Micellar temperature (CMT) [9,10]. They also exhibit other subsequent favorable characteristics such as alleviating toxicities, increasing the extent of delivery to the compromised leaky tumor vasculature sites and in effect, the therapeutic efficacy of these highly hydrophobic chemotherapeutic drugs [11].

Practically insoluble drugs can be incorporated into these micelles by various known techniques such as physical loading by solvent evaporation method or dialysis or by chemical conjugation or other emulsification techniques. Chemical conjugation will usually involve the formation of a stronger covalent bond such as an amide linkage between the end groups of the drug molecule and the polymeric chain. Loading achieved by this technique is pretty robust and with suitable combinatorial chemistry, higher percentage of loading can be tailored as per the surface chemistries of the drug molecule and the polymeric backbone [12]. The stable and robust bonding can pose some problems with the cleavage and the release of the drug moiety in the blood circulation, in presence of enzymes. For that reason, suitable groups that can undergo degradation easily, when in contact with the enzymes, should be inserted at specific sites between the drug molecule and the polymeric chain. Hence, physical loading of highly hydrophobic compounds is the preferred method to adopt in certain instances, as higher percentage of loading along with suitable release can be obtained with these kinds of nanodelivery systems [13,14].

Conclusion

Some distinct advantages of the polymeric micelles include achievement of sustained release of drugs, higher percentage of loading, increase in the solubility profile of highly hydrophobic drugs and optimal size ranges make them highly attractive candidates for drug delivery amongst other nanoparticulate systems. However, there might be some stability issues with this nanoparticulate delivery system as the micelles may undergo disintegration as the polymer concentration falls below the critical micellar concentration, when injected intravenously into the blood or these micelles may aggregate when they start interacting with the plasma proteins or other blood components in vivo.

20182

References

  1. Wakaskar RR, Bathena SPR, Tallapaka SB, Ambardekar VV, Gautam N, et al. (2015) Peripherally cross-linking the shell of core-shell polymer micelles decreases premature release of physically loaded combretastatin A4 in whole blood and increases its mean residence time and subsequent potency against primary murine breast tumors after IV administration. Pharmaceutical Research 32: 1028-1044.
  2. Ambardekar VV, Wakaskar RR, Sharma B, Bowman J, Vayaboury W, et al. (2013) The efficacy of nuclease-resistant Chol-siRNA in primary breast tumors following complexation with PLL-PEG (5K). Biomaterials 34: 4839-4848.
  3. Wakaskar RR (2017) Challenges Pertaining to Adverse Effects of Drugs. International Journal of Drug Development and Research.
  4. Wakaskar RR (2017) Types of Nanocarriers - Formulation Methods and Applications. Journal of Bioequivalence and Bioavailability 9: 10000e77.
  5. Park JH, Lee S, Kim JH, Park K, Kim K, et al. (2008) Polymeric nanomedicine for cancer therapy. Progress in Polymer Science 33: 113-137.
  6. Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC (2005) Nanomedicine: current status and future prospects. The FASEB Journal 19: 311-330.
  7. Wakaskar RR (2017) General Overview of Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles, Dendrimers, Micelles, Liposomes, Spongosomes and Cubosomes. Journal of Drug Targeting,pp: 1-26.
  8. Wakaskar RR (2017) Brief overview of nanoparticulate therapy in cancer. Journal of Drug Targeting,pp: 1-4.
  9. Wakaskar RR (2015) Effect of peripheral shell cross-linking on the efficacy of a hydrophobic vascular disrupting agent physically loaded in core-shell polymeric micelles. University of Nebraska Medical Center.
  10. Wakaskar RR (2017) Passive and Active Targeting in Tumor Microenvironment. International Journal of Drug Development and Research 9: 37-41.
  11. Wakaskar R (2017) Polymeric Micelles and their Properties. J NanomedNanotechnol 8: 433.
  12. Wakaskar R (2017) Cancer Therapy with Drug Delivery Systems. Journal of Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacoproteomics 8: 100e1578.
  13. Trubetskoy V, Torchilin V (1996) Polyethyleneglycol based micelles as carriers of therapeutic and diagnostic agents. STP Pharma Sciences 6: 79-86.
  14. Weissig V, Whiteman KR, Torchilin VP (1998) Accumulation of protein-loaded long-circulating micelles and liposomes in subcutaneous Lewis lung carcinoma in mice. Pharmaceutical Research 15: 1552-1556.