Flyer

Health Science Journal

  • ISSN: 1791-809X
  • Journal h-index: 61
  • Journal CiteScore: 17.30
  • Journal Impact Factor: 18.23
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • CINAHL Complete
  • Scimago
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • EMCare
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
Share This Page

- (2015) Volume 9, Issue 2

Social Influence and Smoking Habit in Adolescent

Aristidis Vasilopoulos1*, Konstantinos Gourgoulianis2, Chryssi Hatzoglou3 and Zoe Roupa4

1Hellenic Center of Disease Control and Prevention, Greece

2Professor of Pneumonology, Rector of University of Thessaly, Greece

3Assistant Professor of Medical Physiology, University of Thessaly, Greece

4Professor University of Nicosia, Cyprus

*Corresponding Author:
Vasilopoulos Aristidis
Hellenic Center of Disease Control and Prevention
Greece, Τaygetou 3rd Par. 23
Lamia – 35100, Greece
Tel: 6973646914
E-mail: aristeilam@yahoo.gr
Visit for more related articles at Health Science Journal

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescence presents a range of physical, mental, psychosexual and social changes. Teenagers influenced by endogenous or exogenous psychosocial factors, resort to using hard drugs or other addictive substances. The nicotine intake of cigarettes is the most common form of addictive substance among teenagers. Material and Method: The sample of the study consisted of high school students aged 13-18 years old, from two cities of central Greece (Lamia- Larisa). Data were collected during the period 01/10/2011-25/02/2012. The questionnaire includes questions on the demographic data of participants and their smoking habits as well as 20 questions relating to social influence, as expressed through and shaped by the social environment and the media. Results: From data analysis the frequency of smoking was 19.2%.The regular smoking of the sample was 10%. The friends of students who smoke are mostly girls (22%) with the percentage of boys standing at 2.6%. The Pearson correlation between the number of cigarettes and number of friends who smoke tested positive for both boys and girls. Conclusion: In conclusion the social influence of tobacco, emerging as one of the most decisive factors promoting smoking activity. The study results indicate that a careful design and a comprehensive smoking policy (and not simply informing young people) about the dangers of smoking are needed.

Keywords

Smoke; Adolescent; Social influence; Prevention

Introduction

Adolescence presents a range of physical, mental, psychosexual and social changes. The teenager at this developmental stage is invited to discover himself and also to determine the social integration and acceptance [1-3].

Teenagers try to be dear, accepted and often eccentric to the eyes of their friends and in their social environment [2,3]. The failure of adolescent to incorporate in any social group, creates a significant mental health disorders and social problems. Adolescence is implicated in the appearance of intense stress and various psychogenic factors leading to the emergence of psychiatric disorders, delinquent and antisocial behavior in teenagers [1-4].

Teenagers influenced by endogenous or exogenous psychosocial factors, resort to using hard drugs or other addictive substances.

The nicotine intake of cigarettes is the most common form of addictive substance among teenagers. According to a study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the U.S.A. the percentage of systematic smoking is estimated at 7.9% for junior high school students and 23.2% for high school students [5]. In Greece in a 2009 study by Sichletidis et al., showed that 29.6% of students were systematic smokers [6]. A similar study by Spyratos et al., [7] in 2012 reported that 14.2% of the sample was systematic smokers. The inclusion of young people in different groups, organizations or gangs lends confidence to the teenager which assists in the development of various social skills. The friendly environment of adolescents contributes decisively to the initiation of smoking and adopting smoking symperiforon [1,8]. The Forza et al., [9] found that adolescents smoked in order to observe the smoking rules of social groups or the rules of their best friend who smokes.

A particular characteristic shows the influence of ads on smoking behaviour of adolescents. The direct and indirect promotion of tobacco products seems to push young people to smoking. In U.S.A. it was calculated that 20% of outdoor billboards illustrates tobacco product [10]. According to Wakefield et al., [11] 3% of adolescents in U.S.A who are affected by ads, will be smokers in the future.

Purpose

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the susceptibility to smoking as "smokers" were those adolescents who had tried even a puff, which this is in line with other international references [1].

Material and Method

The sample of the study consisted of 873 students, aged 13-18 years old, from junior high school and high school students from two cities of central Greece (Lamia-Larisa). The school selection was based on stratified random sampling. Permission to carry out survey was obtained from the Ministry of Education (149051/ Γ2/25-11-2011).

The choice of schools was random in a stratified way. Permission to carry out survey was obtained from the Ministry of Education (149051/Γ2/25-11-2011). Data were collected during the period 01/10/2011-25/02/2012. To ensure the validity of the questionnaire, there was a review of existing international questionnaires in the Greek literature as well as the international databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL.

The questionnaire which used in this research includes questions regarding the participants’ demographic data and smoking habits, as well as 20 questions regarding social influence. The answers to the social influence scale range from 1 (minimum) to 4 or 6 depending on the item (Likert-type scale). The answers to the attitude scale take 1 or 0 value. Cronbach’s α for social influence and attitude were 0.77. The minimum value in the social influence smoking scale was 0 and the maximum was 11. The questions were encoded in a way that the higher values would represent a stronger social influence and higher susceptibility towards smoking. A descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed. After the univariate analysis, we applied a linear prediction model on the extent of social influence of smoking. The model integrated the variables which were correlated statistically significantly, in the univariate analysis, to social influence. The level of statistical significance was set at P=0.05.Of the 1000 questionnaires, 873 were returned completed (response rate 87.3%).The data analyzed by the statistic package of social science SPSS 17.

Results

From data analysis the frequency of smoking was 19.2%.The regular smoking of the sample was 10%. Teenage smokers prefer to smoke with their friends (7.4%), a 4.1% said they smoke anywhere they want and 1.6% smoke secretly (Table 1).

The friends of students who smoke are mostly girls (22%) with the percentage of boys standing at 2.6%. The friends groups consist of students of 3 people who smoke (18%) while more than 3 friends were at 5.2% of the sample (Table 2).

The influence of advertising and social influences occur lower in smokers than in non-smokers, with note that smokers and nonsmokers give average responses in the lower range of the scale (Table 3).

The X2 test displays statistically significant difference in smokers to smoke a cigarette if you accept an offer from a friend while they believe that smoking makes young people of age more attractive (Table 4) [12].

The Pearson correlation between the number of cigarettes and number of friends who smoke tested positive for both boys and girls (Table 5).

Discussion

Τhe findings of this study shows a high prevalence of smoking in adolescence and agree with the findings of previous studies in Greece and abroad. The rates of systemic teen smokers from the present study and globally are particularly increased giving dimensions of a major public health problem.

Comparing the percentage of systematic teen smokers in this study (10%) with the results of the C.D.C. we observed that this study shows almost the same percentage systematic smoking in senior - high school students (7.9%) and lower in high-school students (23.2%).

In Greece similar studies by Spyratos et al. [7] and Kyrlesi et al. [13] shows similar rates of systemic teen smokers (14.2% and 16.2%), while very high proportion (29.6%) is shown in study of Sichletidis et al. [6].

As illustrated by this study and the bibliography, the prevalence of systemic teen smokers is particularly high and may be due to lack antismoking policy and the ineffectiveness of prevention programs.

The social influence emerges both in this study and in international studies as the key factor of smoking habit among adolescents. The contribution of social influence may be indirect, which means that the teenager waiting for others to define their behavior, or direct, through observation of the behavior of others and the impact that has on their health and their social visibility [14-16]. Friends have a significant influence on teenagers’ life.

The main feature of adolescent period is the integration of young people in different groups, organizations or gangs. The collective mode of expression lends confidence to the teenager who assists in the development of various social skills. Many times the young moving within the collective sovereignty shall delinquency ethical and legal rules, vandalism and the use of addictive ousion [14,15].

This study is consistent with the results of Forza et al. [9] and Moeini et al. [17]. Both studies show a statistically significant difference between smoking and friends’ smoking. The social influence of smoking habit is a complex phenomenon with biological and social components and requires further investigation.

The effect of tobacco advertising in smoking behavior of adolescents is particularly high. Children smoke the most advertizing brands, which emphasizes that ads can affect teenagers to smoke as adults. Teenagers smoke the most frequently advertised brands of cigarettes, a phenomenon that shows that advertising messages, supposedly aimed at adults, can affect by the same way the adolescents [18-20].

More susceptible to start smoking are teens that often see pictures of people smoking or watch tobacco advertisements. Scientists agree that advertising has a subconscious influence and pushes children to start smoking. The advertising influences children to start smoking through messages that present smoking as a means of liberation and independence [21,22].

The results of this study show a positive influence of advertising on smoking habits of adolescents and coincide with the corresponding results of the study of Wakefield et al. [11] demonstrating the importance of advertising in the beginning of smoking activity, but also in shaping smoking behavior of adolescents.

In conclusion the social influence of tobacco, emerges as one of the most decisive factors for promoting smoking activity. The study results indicate that a careful design and a comprehensive smoking policy (and not simply informing young people about the dangers of smoking) are needed. Our findings constitute the need for aggressive intervention during adolescence, where the first concern should be to reduce the supply of smoking products and the minimization of tobacco advertising.

5188

References

  1. Cicchetti D, Toth SL (1998) The development of depression in children and adolescents. Am Psychol 53: 221-241.
  2. Bansal V, Goyal S, Srivastava K (2009) Study of prevalence of depression in adolescent students of a public school. Ind Psychiatry J 18: 43-46.
  3. Vogel JS, Hurford DP, Smith JV, Cole A (2003) The relationship between depression and smoking in adolescents. Adolescence 38: 57-74.
  4. Steuber TL, Danner F (2006) Adolescent smoking and depression: which comes first? Addict Behav 31: 133-136.
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2012) Current tobacco use among middle and high school students--United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61: 581-585.
  6. Sichletidis LT, Chloros DA, Tsiotsios AI, Spyratos DG (2009) Prevalence and risk factors for initiation of smoking in Greek high-school students. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6: 971-979.
  7. Spyratos D, Pelagidou D, Chloros D, Haidich A, Karetsi E, et al. (2012) Smoking among adolescents in Northern Greece: a large cross-sectional study about risk and preventive factors. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 7: 38.
  8. Abreu MN, Caiaffa WT (2011) [Influence of family environment and social group on smoking among Brazilian youth aged 15 to 24 years]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 30: 22-30.
  9. Forza G, Buja A, Tognazzo F, Vinelli A, Baldo V, et al. (2012) Smoking in early and mid-adolescence. J Dev Behav Pediatr 33: 449-455.
  10. Luke D, Esmundo E, Bloom Y (2000) Smoke signs: patterns of tobacco billboard advertising in a metropolitan region. Tob Control 9: 16-23.
  11. Wakefield M, McElrath Y, Emery S, Saffer H, Chaloupa F, et al. (2006) Effect of televised tobacco company – funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions and behaviour. Am J Public Health 96: 2154-2160.
  12. 12  Crawford MA, Tobacco Control Network Writing Group (2001) Cigarette smoking and adolescents: messages they see and hear. Public Health Rep 116 Suppl 1: 203-215.
  13. Kyrlesi A, Soteriades ES, Warren CW, Kremastinou J, Papastergiou P, et al. (2007) Tobacco use among students aged 13-15 years in Greece: the GYTS project. BMC Public Health 7: 3.
  14. Alexander C, Piazza M, Mekos D, Valente T (2001) Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. J Adolesc Health 29: 22-30.
  15. Andrews JA, Tildesley E, Hops H, Li F (2002) The influence of peers on young adult substance use. Health Psychol 21: 349-357.
  16. Simons-Morton BG, Farhat T (2010) Recent findings on peer group influences on adolescent smoking. J Prim Prev 31: 191-208.
  17. Moeini B, Poorolajal J, Gharghani ZG (2012) Prevalence of cigarette smoking and associated risk factors among adolescents in Hamadan City, west of Iran in 2010. J Res Health Sci 12: 31-37.
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2005) Estimated exposure of adolescents to state-funded anti-tobacco television advertisements--37 states and the District of Columbia, 1999-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 54: 1077-1080.
  19. Ross I (1971) Self-concept and brand preference. The Journal of Business 44: 38-50.
  20. Dube SR, Arrazola RA, Lee J, Engstrom M, Malarcher A (2013) Pro-tobacco influences and susceptibility to smoking cigarettes among middle and high school students--United States, 2011. J Adolesc Health 52: S45-51.
  21. Ogwell AE, Aström AN, Haugejorden O (2003) Socio-demographic factors of pupils who use tobacco in randomly-selected primary schools in Nairobi province, Kenya. East Afr Med J 80: 235-241.
  22. Everett SA, Warren CW, Sharp D, Kann L, Husten CG, et al. (1999) Initiation of cigarette smoking and subsequent smoking behavior among U.S. high school students. Prev Med 29: 327-333.