Flyer

Health Science Journal

  • ISSN: 1791-809X
  • Journal h-index: 61
  • Journal CiteScore: 17.30
  • Journal Impact Factor: 18.23
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • CINAHL Complete
  • Scimago
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • EMCare
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
Share This Page

- (2012) Volume 6, Issue 3

The ethics of care rationing within the current socioeconomic constraints

Evridiki Papastavrou*

RN, MSc, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology

*Corresponding Author:
Evridiki Papastavrou
RN, MSc, PhD, Assistant Professor
Department of Nursing
School of Health Sciences
Cyprus University of Technology
Cyprus
Visit for more related articles at Health Science Journal

Abstract

The recent economic and financial crisis has weighed heavily on fiscal positions of many countries in the European Union and especially Greece. These pressures as well as a clear need to contain public spending on health care.

The recent economic and financial crisis has weighed heavily on fiscal positions of many countries in the European Union and especially Greece. These pressures as well as a clear need to contain public spending on health care [1,2] will make nursing a constant target for cost reduction. Nursing practice involves a variety of tasks and when resources are limited, nurses are forced to ration their attention across patients, minimize or omit certain duties, thereby increasing the risk of adverse patient outcomes [3]. Lack of resources and time constraints have been reported as causes of rationing and poor patient outcomes including patient falls, nosocomial infections, pressure ulcers, high mortality rates and low patient satisfaction levels. Similarly nurses’ outcomes of rationing are reported, such as low job and occupational satisfaction and intention to leave [3-10].

A considerable amount of nursing literature offers an additional perspective of rationing, placing the issue within the ethics of care and the moral relevance of balancing and prioritising between the differing and competing needs of patients [11-14]. Much of the Norwegian literature mentioned above indicate that individual aspects of nursing care are under severe strain in contemporary health care and documented lack of adequate attention to important needs especially of the old patients. Elderly people are particularly vulnerable and at risk of neglected and being discriminated against when nurses prioritize their work. Lack of time and scarcity of resources were cited as barriers to the use of appropriate forms of address, listening, giving people choices, including them, respecting their need for privacy and making them feel valued [15]. The philosophy of care that refers to the personal beliefs, values, and ideals of nurses and what nursing tries to achieve [16-17] may also be influenced by these constraints. For example, nurses who have access to limited resources in health care may feel that humanistic and holistic care is not realistic and may subsequently develop their own personal standards of care to cope with such limitations [11,13,18]. Such standards can be heavily influenced by a biomedical ethos. This could partly explain why nurses focus on clinical tasks first emphasising ‘medical’ needs at the expense of holistic and individualised care [13]. However, none of these studies has produced any evidence linking the concept of philosophy of care to rationing.

On the other hand, Nortvedt et al., [15] in their article “The ethics of care: Role obligations and moderate partiality in health care” give a pessimistic prophecy by saying: “If the conditions of caring for specific patients are constantly impoverished, the basic structure of professional knowledge as well as respect for and protection of patients, is jeopardized”. We hope that despite the current financial situation, the commitment of Greek nurses open to collaboration with all health care agencies will succeed in the common goal of providing every patient with the proper care respecting human dignity.

3214

References

  1. OECD. Health care systems: Getting more value for money. OECD Economics Department Policy Notes 2010
  2. OECD. Greece at a glance: Policies for a sustainable recovery 2012. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/39/44785912.pdf .
  3. Schubert M, Clarke SP, Glass TR, Schaffert-Witvliet B, and De Geest S. Identifying thresholds for relationships between impacts of rationing of nursing care and nurse- and patient-reported outcomes in Swiss hospitals: A correlational study. Int J Nurs Stud 2009; 46: 884-893.
  4. Sochalski J. Is more better?: The relationship between nurse staffing and the quality of nursing care in hospitals. Med Care 2004; 42: II67-73.
  5. Kalisch BJ, Landstrom G, and Williams RA. Missed nursing care: Errors of omission. Nurs Outlook 2009; 57: 3-9.
  6. Kalisch BJ, Lee H, and Rochman M. Nursing staff teamwork and job satisfaction. J Nurs Manag 2010; 18: 938-947.
  7. Kalisch BJ, Tschannen D, Lee H, and Friese CR. Hospital variation in missed nursing care. Am J Med Qual 2011; 26: 291-299.
  8. Lucero R. Nursing informatics implications from a study of unmet nursing care needs. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 146: 817.
  9. Tschannen D, Kalisch BJ, and Lee KH. Missed nursing care: The impact on intention to leave and turnover. Can J Nurs Res 2010; 42: 22-39.
  10. Rochefort CM, Clarke SP. Nurses' work environments, care rationing, job outcomes, and quality of care on neonatal units. J Adv Nurs 2010; 66: 2213-2224.
  11. Halvorsen K, Forde R, and Nortvedt P. Professional challenges of bedside rationing in intensive care. Nurs Ethics 2008; 15: 715-728.
  12. Skirbekk H, Nortvedt P. Making a difference: A qualitative study on care and priority setting in health care. Health Care Anal 2011; 19: 77-88.
  13. Nortvedt P, Pedersen R, Grothe KH, Nordhaug M, Kirkevold M, Slettebo A, Brinchmann BS, and Andersen B. Clinical prioritisations of healthcare for the aged--professional roles. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 332-335.
  14. Arvidsson E, Andre M, Borgquist L, and Carlsson P. Priority setting in primary health care - dilemmas and opportunities: A focus group study. BMC Fam Pract 2010; 11: 71.
  15. Nortvedt P, Hem MH, and Skirbekk H. The ethics of care: Role obligations and moderate partiality in health care. Nurs Ethics 2011; 18: 192-200.
  16. Dunwell F, Hanson B. Appraising a ward's 'philosophy of care' statement, Ment Health Nurs 1998; 18: 18-22.
  17. Hendry C, Walker A. Priority setting in clinical nursing practice: Literature review. J Adv Nurs 2004; 47: 427-436.
  18. Tonnessen S, Nortvedt P, and Forde R. Rationing home-based nursing care: Professional ethical implications. Nurs Ethics 2011; 18: 386-396.