Research Article - (2016) Volume 4, Issue 2
Soledad Vera*, Luz Maria Pozo, René Lopez, Joaquin Diaz and Paulette Conget
Center for Regenerative Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine German University, Chile
*Corresponding Author:
Soledad Vera
Center for Regenerative Medicine
School of Clinical Medicine German University Santiago, Chile
Tel: +56223279498
E-mail: svera@udd.cl
Received date: 11 April 2016; Accepted date: 20 May 2016; Published date: 23 May 2016
Citation: Vera S, Maria Pozo L, Lopez R, et al. The Plasma is a Suitable Sample for Moderate Magnesium Deficiency Assessment but the Poor Accuracy of Colorimetric Technique Limits its Use. Ann Clin Lab Res. 2016, 4:2.
Background: The broadly disseminated notion that plasmatic concentration of magnesium is not a good indicator of its corporal status bases on the fact that normal magnesemia is reported in people with magnesium deficiency. The aim of this study was to identify a suitable sample for the assessment of magnesium corporal status in magnesium moderate deficiency.
Methods and Findings: Female mice were fed with regular or low magnesium diet for 45 days. Bone, muscle, platelets and plasma were sampled and magnesium content was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry or using a colorimetric assay. As expected, magnesium content in bones was significantly diminished in animals fed with low magnesium diet when compared with those fed with normal diet (14.6 ± 0.5 versus 16.7 ± 0.2 mmol/100 g, p<0.05). Magnesium moderate deficiency was replicated in plasma (0.76 ± 0.08 versus 0.94 ± 0.09 mmol/L, p<0.05) but not in muscle or platelet samples. The correlation between bone and plasma magnesium contents was 0.53. ROC curve analysis revealed 83% specificity and 75% sensitivity for plasma magnesium cut off of 0.84 mmol/L.
Conclusion: Plasma is a suitable sample to determine magnesium corporal status when deficiency is moderate. But, poor accuracy of colorimetric technique limits its use.
Keywords
Magnesium, Corporal status, Deficiency, Assessment, Plasma
Introduction
Magnesium is an intracellular divalent cation involved in many cellular processes, among others energy metabolism, DNA transcription and protein synthesis [1]. Due to food processing and impoverishment of agriculture soils, the occidental population is consuming less magnesium than required [2,3]. Magnesium deficiency has been associated with cardiovascular pathologies [4,5], Diabetes Mellitus type I and II [6,7], asthma [8], anxiety [9] and depression [10].
In human adult total corporal magnesium reached 20-24 g [3]. Almost 65% of it is found in bones, 27% in muscles, 7% in soft tissue and 1% in the extracellular fluids [11]. Magnesium in bones is the exchangeable pool that buffers systemic changes in magnesium concentration [12-14]. Thus, bone magnesium level indicates magnesium corporal status. Unfortunately, biopsy limits its routine use.
Magnesium in plasma corresponds to 0.3% of total corporal magnesium. In healthy humans plasma magnesium concentration ranged from 0.75-0.96 mmol/L [15]. While severe hypomagnesemia reflects low corporal content, normomagnesemia does not necessarily indicate normal corporal status [5]. Furthermore, the equilibrium between intracellular and plasma magnesium pools is achieved very slowly. Thus, whether magnesium assessed in plasma reflects its corporal status is, still, a matter of controversy [3,4,15-18].
The aim of this study was to identify a suitable sample for the assessment of magnesium corporal status in moderate deficiency using the simplest analytical technique.
Materials and Methods
Animals and diets
C57BL6 female mice 8 week-old were housed in individual cages at constant temperature (22°C), with a 12:12 light-dark cycles and fed ad libitum with either normal (121 mg/100 g food, D11112201) or low (39 mg/100 g food D14021701) magnesium diet (Research Diets Inc. USA). The former diet exceeds and the later ensures 78% of daily mice requirements [10].
When required, animals were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of Ketamine 50 mg/Kg and Xylacine 5 mg/Kg, and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. All animal protocols were approved by the Committee of Care and Use of Experimental Animals of Facultad de Medicina Clinica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo.
Procuration, processing and storage of samples
Bone and muscle samples from femur and tibia were procured immediately after sacrifice, rinsed in physiological serum and dried for one hour at 90°C. Blood samples were collected by intracardiac puncture with heparinized syringes and tubes. For platelets isolation, 500 μL of whole blood was centrifuged at 200 g for 20 minutes at room temperature. The supernatant containing platelet rich plasma was further centrifuged at 1,600 g for 10 minutes and the pellet obtained was suspended in physiological serum. Platelets were counted using a flow cytometer (Dako, USA). For plasma isolation, whole blood was centrifugated at 1600 g for 10 minutes at room temperature.
All samples were stored at -80°C until been analyzed.
Measurement of magnesium content
Bone and muscle samples were calcined for 8 hours. Magnesium was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy in Atomic Absorption Spectrometer Spectra 55B Varian [17]. Platelets and plasma were thawed at room temperature, and the total magnesium in them was determined using a colorimetric kit (Mg color-AA. Wiener Lab, Argentina). Briefly, in alkaline solution, magnesium react with Xilydyl Blue forming a purple-red complex, being its intensity proportional to the magnesium concentration present in the sample [19]. The procedure was: 10 ul of plasma was mixed with 1 ml of reagent, after 5 minutes of incubation at room temperature the intensity of color was measured at 510 nm Briefly, [19]. Calcium interference was avoided by the addition of ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid to the reaction mixture [20].
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Group comparisons were performed by unpaired T-test. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The association between content of magnesium in bones and plasma was established by Pearson correlation. ROC analysis was done to identify the value of plasmatic magnesium concentration that allows to distinguish between normal and moderate deficient individuals (bone magnesium ≤15 mmol/100 g) [21].
Graphics were generated with GraphPad Prism version 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Results
As shown in Figure 1A, animals fed for 45 days with a low magnesium diet did not modify their body weight. Together, no adverse effect (loss of awareness, change in food and water intake, disease development) was observed.
Figure 1: Animal model of moderate magnesium deficiency, A) The body weight of mice was determined along the study period (normal n=32, low magnesium diet n=35). B) Forty-five days after diet switch magnesium content was measured in bone samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometric (normal n=3, low magnesium diet n=5).
Bone magnesium was significantly diminished in animals fed with low magnesium diet compared with animals fed with the regular diet (14.6 ± 0.5 versus 16.7 ± 0.2 mmol/100 g, p<0.05) (Figure 1B). Since the content of magnesium in bones is the main indicator of its corporal status, these data support a moderate magnesium deficiency model. Compared with normal mice, moderate magnesium deficient animals present no differences of magnesium content in muscles or platelets (Figures 2A and 2B). Nevertheless its concentration in plasma replicates the differences observed in bones (Figure 2C).
Figure 2: Plasma magnesium concentration reflects moderate magnesium deficiency. Magnesium content was measured in muscle (A), platelets (B) and plasma (C) obtained from normal and moderate magnesium deficient mice (normal n=3, low magnesium n=8).
Pearson correlation was performed with data obtained from 37 animals, with different sex, age and magnesium corporal status. The association obtained between magnesium concentration assessed in bone and plasma was 0.53 (Figure 3A). ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.78 (IC 0.60-0.95, p<0.05), 83% specificity and 75% sensibility for plasma magnesium cut off of 0.84 mmol/L (Figure 3B).
Figure 3: Poor accuracy of colorimetric magnesium assessment in plasma samples. A) Association between bone and plasma magnesium content was determined using Pearson correlation, r=0.53 (n=37). B) Specificity and sensitivity of plasma magnesium assessment was determined using ROC curve. AUC=0.78 (IC 0.60-0.95, p<0.05). The arrow indicates the point of maximum specificity and sensitivity (0.84 mmol/L).
Discussion
Here we presented an animal model of moderated magnesium deficiency generated after feeding mice for 45 days with a diet that supplies 78% of their diary requirement (39 versus 50 mg/100 g of food) [9]. Moderate magnesium deficiency is detectable only in bone and plasma samples.
Our mice model mimics better the magnesium deficiency in humans than rat model previously described because rats were fed with a diet that supply only 10% of their diary requirement and developed severe hypomagnesemia (0.6 mmol/L versus 1.2 mmol/L) in only 14 days [22].
In moderate magnesium deficient mice we did not observed a statistically significant difference in muscle magnesium content compared to normal mice. It is known that the equilibrium of magnesium in muscle takes long time [13]. Therefore if deficiency is prolonged this would be reflected in muscle tissue.
Our results regarding platelets content of magnesium showed great intragroup variability, both in normal and moderate deficient individuals. This may be due to platelet activation during the isolation process [23]. Thus, though platelets have been suggested as a good candidate to assess intracellular magnesium content the variability caused by handling prevents its use in the assessment of magnesium corporal status.
The modest correlation found between bone and plasma magnesium concentration is explain because: i) most samples became from individuals with moderate magnesium deficiency. Hence, their plasma magnesium concentration placed in the center of the curve, ii) intra-assay precision for colorimetric method used was for high values CV 4.3% and for low values CV 20%. These numbers are in agreement with data previously reported (1%-12%) [24]. The later also limits the sensitivity (75%) and specificity (83%) of the assay when using plasma samples. Thus, our data supports the fact that the validity to assess magnesium corporal status in individuals with moderate magnesium deficiency depends on the analytical technique rather than the sample.
In conclusion, the plasma is a proper sample to study magnesium corporal status when deficiency is moderate. Unfortunately, the high variability of the colorimetric technique limited assay accuracy. It would be desirable to have a simple technique with a high performance.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Javiera Bahamonde for English editing of the manuscript
This work was supported by Grant Number 23400109, Dirección de Investigación, UDD
9387
