Flyer

Archives in Cancer Research

  • ISSN: 2254-6081
  • Journal h-index: 14
  • Journal CiteScore: 3.77
  • Journal Impact Factor: 4.09
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • J-Gate
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
  • Zenodo
Share This Page

Research Article - (2015) Volume 3, Issue 1

Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of the Brain to Differentiate Low Grade Glioma and its Clinical Relevance

Senol Jadik*
UKSH Kiel Campus, Kiel, Schleswig- Holstein, Germany
Corresponding Author: Senol Jadik, UKSH Kiel Campus, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany,Tel: +49 431 597243, E-mail: sjadik@hotmail.com
Related article at Pubmed, Scholar Google
Visit for more related articles at Archives in Cancer Research

Abstract

Background and purpose:

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic examination plays an important role in diagnosis of low grade gliomas. We compared the spectroscopic examination with the histopathological results of low grade gliomas concerning its reliability and their clinical relevance.

Materials and methods:

The charts of 29 patients with low grade gliomas were collected. Only in 19 cases of them an NMR-spectroscopic examination was performed. Due to choline, N-acetylaspartate (NAA) and lipid content the gliomas were classified into astrocytoma WHO II or III or in low or high grade gliomas. After stereotactic biopsy or neurosurgical removal histopathological examination was performed.

Results:

We found 18 astrocytomas WHO II and 1 oligodendroglioma WHO II at the histopathological examination. In the spectroscopic examination we found 13 low grade gliomas II and 6 high grade gliomas. 68.4% of the 19 low grade gliomas WHO II correspond to the spectroscopic examination. 6 cases showed high choline contents suitable for high grade glioma and one of them with very high choline content which correspond to a glioblastoma. These tumours were classified as low grade gliomas WHO II in the histopathological examination.

Conclusion:

We compared the NMR-spectroscopic findings with the histopathological results of the tumours. The actual spectroscopical method does not seem to be reliable enough in the diagnosis of low grade gliomas but can play an important role in assessing the clinical condition and follow-up. Whether the NMR-spectroscopic findings correlate with the clinical course better than with the histopathological findings remains to be clarified.

Keywords

Low grade glioma; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Choline; N-acetylaspartate

Abbreviations

Cho: Choline; NAA: N-acetylaspartate; tCr: total Creatine; 1H MRS: Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Introduction

Accurate histological diagnosis of gliomas is fundamental to optimal treatment of patients and to the interpretation of basic and clinical investigations. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility are compromised by the subjective histologic criteria currently used to classify and grade gliomas.
If the histologic features of gliomas were reviewed independently by 4 neuropathologists to determine interobserver diagnostic concordance rates, it will be for all 4 reviewers 69%, any 3 reviewers 75% and 2 reviewers 80% [1].
1H MR-spectroscopy offers a risk free method for the diagnosis of the brain lesions by providing biochemical information related to mitotic cell division (Cho), displacement of neural tissue (NAA), energy metabolism (total creatine (tCr)), and necrotic transformation (lipids) [2-5].
The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 1H MR-spectroscopy in the preoperative evaluation of low grade glioma and compare the results versus postoperative histopathological findings and discuss the clinical relevance.

Materials and Methods

Patients population

We performed a retrospective study in 19 patients referred to the Neurosurgery Department of the Neurocenter of the University Clinic of Frankfurt am Main between 1999 and 2003. The age ranged from 24 to 68 years. The mean age was 37.8 (±11.6) years. The clinical, neuroradiological and neuropathological data of the patients were collected prospectively in a data bank. The patient’s demographic data are shown in Table 1.

1H NMR-spectroscopy

All patients underwent 1H MR-spectroscopy before complete or incomplete resection if feasible, otherwise stereotactical biopsy was been performed. The MR-spectroscopical examinations were carried out in the Institute of Neuroradiology at the Neurocenter of the University of Frankfurt. 1H MR-spectroscopical studies were performed with a clinical 1.5 Tesla MR scanner. After acquisition of axial T2 and post contrast T1-weighted axial and coronal MRtomograms, a single voxel 1H MR-spectroscopy was conducted. After selection of the voxel of interest (VOI), one or two water suppressed metabolite spectra were acquired using double spin-echo localization technique and frequency selective water suppression. Reference data were obtained with the VOI located in the mirror image region of the contra-lateral hemisphere. Depending on the size of selected VOI’s, 128 to 512 acquisitions with an echo time of 135 ms and repetition time of 1500 ms were added. Spectroscopic raw data were analyzed with the MRUI tool. The resulting metabolite signal intensities of NAA, total creatine (tCr), choline (Cho), lipids (Lip) and lactate (Lac) from the tumour tissue were quantified (normalized) by calculating their ratio to the signal intensity of tCr measured in the reference spectrum and expressed as ratio of the reference tCr from the tumour tissue. The spectroscopic diagnoses were established by an experienced neuroradiologist before the complete or incomplete resection if feasible, otherwise stereotactical biopsy was been performed.

Spectroscopical diagnosis

Spectroscopical diagnoses were established using stringent diagnostic criteria [6]. The voxel-positioning, in relation to solid tumour components was controlled in order to exclude considerable partial volume effects. Second, local field homogeneity and signal to noise ratio of the spectra were assessed; the criterion of sufficient field homogeneity was good resolution of the signals at 3.05 and 3.20 ppm originating from Cho and tCr. Adequate signal to noise ratio was considered to be present if the most prominent peak of the spectrum – mostly Cho – yielded a standard deviation of the MRUI fit of 5% or less. Lesions showing a slight decrease (up to 20% decrease as compared with normal white matter) or a moderate increase in Cho signal intensity (50% or less) were rated as low grade tumour, while spectra showing an increase in Cho signal intensity of more than 50% were rated as a high grade neoplasm. Grade III tumours typically showed lower Cho levels than grade IV tumours (150 to 220% for grade III vs. 180% to over 500% for grade IV tumours) [7].
Lesions with imaging features suggestive of a neoplasm but showing clearly reduced Cho signal intensity (lower than 80% of normal) were judged to be non-neoplastic. Differentiation of non-enhancing sub-acute silent infarction from low grade tumours was achieved by high Lac in addition to the reduction in the concentration of the other metabolites, especially NAA. Diagnostic criteria of gliosis were reduced levels of NAA, tCr, and Cho without evidence of Lip and/or Lac. The process of making the final imaging and spectroscopic diagnosis consists of two steps:
1. Assignment of plain MR spectrograms to one of the following groups: non-tumourous-inflammative lesions, non-tumourous-noninflammative lesion, extra-axial high grade tumour, extra axial low grade tumour, intraaxial low grade tumour, intra-axial high grade tumour without necrosis, intra-axial high grade tumour with necrosis.
2. Establishment of the final pre histopathological diagnosis after consideration of information obtained from conventional MRI (location of lesion, signal characteristics, contrast enhancement etc.).

Histopathological diagnosis

Smear preparations of the biopsy specimens were intra operatively examined by an attending neuropathologist from the Department of Neuropathology (Edinger Institute). The final diagnosis, based on paraffin-embedded tissue specimens with conventional and immunohistochemical analysis, was assessed by an experienced neuropathologist.

Statistical methods

For the statistical procedures, a commercially available software package (SPSS 10.0) was used. Sensitivity and specificity for 1H MR-spectroscopy were obtained. Patients for whom a definite histopathological diagnosis and MR spectroscopic diagnosis were not achieved were not considered for these calculations.

Results

The final diagnosis, taking account of 1H MR-spectroscopy and the histopathological findings are shown in Table 2.
There have been in 13 (64.8%) cases an accordance of the 1H MR-spectroscopy with the histopthological findings and no accordance in 6 (31.6%) cases.
The 1H MR-spectroscopy established 13 low grade glioma and 6 high grade glioma. NAA levels were been decreased from 9-86% compared to the mirror image of the contra-lateral hemisphere. Cho signal intensities were increased up to 87-150%. Cho levels more than 160% were considered as high grade gliomas. In the current study the Cho levels of the high grade gliomas ranged from 164 to 441%. Spectroscopically it was not possible to distinguish between Astrocytoma II and III or between Astrocytoma and Oligodendroglioma. Patient demographics are shown in Table 1. The spectroscopically established intensities are shown in Table 3.
Histopathological there was been established 18 Astrocytoma WHO II and one Oligodendroglioma WHO II.
In one case Cho increase up to 441% was been noted compared to the mirror image of the contra-lateral healthy hemisphere. The spectroscopical diagnosis was been high grade glioma in contrast to Astrozytoma II of the histopathological establishment. The clinical course of the patient showed a rapid deterioration suitably to glioblastoma WHO IV.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostical accuracy of 1H MR-spectroscopy in the preoperative evaluation of low grade glioma and compare the results versus postoperative histopathological findings and discuss the clinical relevance.
We found accordance in 13 (64.8%) cases of the 1H MRspectroscopy with the histopthological findings and no accordance in 6 (31.6%) cases.
Nowadays, the diagnosis of glioma is mainly based on an examination of neuroimages, with presence of diffuse infiltration of cerebral parenchyma on MR images, contrast enhancement and on histopathological findings in general acceptance as gold standard.
The wide range of survival times reported for patients with glioma may reflect contamination resulting from misdiagnosis, particularly of oligodendroglial tumours and pilocytic astrocytomas and the limits of these diagnostic criteria.
Indeed, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate low grade gliomas because they have the following characteristics: 1) they may infiltrate large areas of brain parenchyma; 2) most often display a lack of contrast enhancement; and 3) are often indistinguishable during review of stereotactical brain biopsy specimen.
If the histologic features of gliomas were reviewed independently by 4 neuropathologists to determine interobserver diagnostic concordance rates, it will be for all 4 reviewers 69%, any 3 reviewers 75% and 2 reviewers 80% [1].
In view of the known failure rate of stereotactic biopsies of 7-15% [8-11] and the interobserver diagnostic concordance rates [1], information about the progress of the disease, (follow-up clinical examinations, follow-up neuroradiological examinations, results of repeated stereotactical biopsy or repeated open surgery) should be considered in the treatment of patients with low grade glioma.
1H MR-spectroscopy provides additional information to the neuroradiological examination, which also could be used easily in follow up examinations.
There are significant spectral differences between tumour and normal brain tissue shown in 1H MR-spectroscopic studies. These differences in metabolite spectra have been consistently detected, even for different acquisition parameters, as techniques have progressed from obtaining single-voxel spectra within a tissue volume as large as 2 cm3 [12-18] to present techniques that provide hundreds of contiguous voxels at resolution of 1 cm3 or less [19,20].
Tumour spectra have been characterized in part by reduction in signal intensity of the NAA resonance at 2.0 ppm (NAA and other NAA-containing compounds), which has been shown to be present in millimolar concentrations, mainly within neurons [21]. Although the majority of studies have reported increased choline levels (measured at 3.1 ppm) in tumours compared with normal brain tissue, the measured levels can be highly variable presumably because of differences in tumour cell proliferation and averaging tumour tissue with normal or necrotic tissues [5,16,19,22].
The practical application of 1H MR-spectroscopy has a poor appraisal. The spectroscopically established diagnosis before operative intervention is mostly considered to be incorrect as soon as the histopathological finding emerges.
In general the site of biopsy and the site of spectroscopy did not correlate, so it could represent another reason for iscordance between the histopathology and spectroscopy results, the biopsy of a hot spot in the spectroscopy in suggestive low-grade gliomas may help to identify focal points of higher tumour malignancy and offer advantages as compared to conventional stereotactic biopsy.
The spectroscopy findings needed to be correlated with clinical outcomes data to state significant discordance between the histopathology and spectroscopy results.
1H MR-spectroscopy offers a risk free method for the diagnosis of the brain lesions by providing biochemical information related to mitotic cell division (total cholin compounds) displacement of neural tissue (N-acetylaspartate), energy metabolism (total creatine), and necrotic transformation (lipids) [2,3,5,7].
Furthermore 1H MR-spectroscopy provides considerable advantages. It is reported to predict accurately the response of therapy in vivo [23], to identify the border between viable tumour and brain parenchyma shown on conventional MR images [24,25] and to differentiate between tumour and post radiation necrosis [26].
Recent studies of Shao using 1H NMR spectroscopy reveal metabolic heterogeneity of glioma cell lines with different degrees of malignancy [27].
Other spectroscopically methods like 31P Phosphorus spectroscopy using metabolites inorganic phosphates and Phosphocreatine seem to be an additional tool in assessing grades of gliomas [28].
Pulsed arterial spin-labeling and diffusion tensor imaging as additional method to MR spectroscopy seem to be very useful for predicting glioma grade [29].
However 1H MR-spectroscopy will never replace the gold standard of histopathological diagnosis, but it can give additional information beyond morphology and help better understanding glioma in their appearance and clinical course.

Conclusion

It is not possible to distinguish with spectroscopical methods between Astrocytoma II and III or between Astrocytoma and Oligodendroglioma.
1H MR-spectroscopy provides objective and quantitative metabolic diagnostic criteria and offers new insights into pathophysiology of low grade gliomas and provides additional aspects to histopthological considerations. 1H MR-spectroscopy could be used routinely in follow up of patients in particular with low grade gliomas.

Tables at a glance

Table icon Table icon Table icon
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
 
 
4899

References

  1. Coons SW, Johnson PC, Scheithauer BW, Yates AJ, Pearl DK (1997) Improving diagnostic accuracy and interobserver concordance in the classification and grading of primary gliomas. Cancer 79: 1381-1393.
  2. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Gotsis SD, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, et al. (2000) In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 74: 83-94.
  3. Graves EE, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB, Verheya L, McDermotta MD, et al. (2000) A preliminary study of the prognostic value of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in gamma knife radiosurgery of recurrent malignant gliomas. Neurosurgery 46: 319-328.
  4. Herminghaus S, Dierks T, Pilatus U, Möller-Hartmann W, Wittsack J, et al. (2003) Determination of histopathological tumor grade in neuroepithelial brain tumors by using spectral pattern analysis of in vivo spectroscopic data. J Neurosurg 98: 74-81.
  5. Setzer M, Herminghaus S, Marquardt G, Tews DS, Pilatus U, et al. Diagnostic impact of proton MR-spectroscopy versus image-guided stereotactic biopsy. Acta Neurochirurgica 149: 379-386.
  6. Möller-Hartmann W, Herminghaus S, Krings T, Marquardt G, Lanfermann H, et al. (2002) Clinical application of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the diagnosis of intracranial mass lesions. Neuroradiology 44: 371-381.
  7. Herminghaus S, Pilatus U, Moller-Hartmann W, Raab P, Lanfermann H, et al. (2002) Increased choline levels coincide with enhanced proliferative activity of human neuroepithelial brain tumours. NMR Biomed 15: 385-392.
  8. Apuzzo ML, Chandrasoma PT, Cohen D, Zee CS, Zelman V (1987) Computed imaging stereotaxy: experience and perspective related to 500 procedures applied to brain masses. Neurosurgery 20: 930-937.
  9. Lundsford LD (1989) Diagnosis and treatment of brain lesions using the Leksell stereotactic system. In: Lundsford LD (edn) Modern stereotactic neurosurgery. Martinus-Nijhoff, Boston 145-168.
  10. Ostertag CB, Mennel HD, Kiessling M (1980) Stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors. Surg Neurol 14: 275-283.
  11. 11.Walter AH (1998) The safety and efficacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Cancer 82: 1749-55.
  12. Walter AH (1998) The safety and efficacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Cancer 82: 1749-55.
  13. Alger JR, Frank JA, Bizzi A, Fulham MJ, DeSouza BX, et al.(1990) Metabolism of human gliomas: assessment with H-1 MR spectroscopy and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Radiology 177: 633-641.
  14. Matson GB, Weiner MW (v) MR spectroscopy in vivo: principles, animal studies and clinical applications. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG (eds.) Magnetic resonance imaging. CV Mosby St. Louis. pp. 201-228
  15. Demaerel P, Johannik K, Van Hecke P, Van Ongeval C, Verellen S, et al. (1991) Localized 1H NMR spectroscopy in fifty cases of newly diagnosed intracranial tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15: 67-76
  16. McBride DQ, Miller BL, Nikas DL, Buchthal S, Chang L, et al.(1995) Analysis of brain tumors using 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Surg Neurol 44: 137-144.
  17. Negendank WG, Sauter R, Brown TR, Evelhoch JL, Falini A, et al. (1996) Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with glial tumors: a multicenter study. J Neurosurg 84: 449-458.
  18. Negendank WG (1992) Studies of human tumours by MRS: a review. NMR Biomed 5: 303-324.
  19. Shimizu H, Kumabe T, Tominaga T, Kayama T, Hara K, et al. (1996) Noninvasive evaluation of malignancy of brain tumours with proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR 17: 737-747.
  20. Fulham MJ, Bizzi A, Dietz MJ, Shih HH, Raman R, et al. (1992) Mapping of brain tumor metabolites with proton MR spectroscopic imaging: clinical relevance. Radiology 185: 675-686.
  21. Go KG, Keuter EJ, Kamman RL, Pruim J, Metzemaekers JD, et al. (1994) Contribution of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging and L-[1-11C]tyrosine positron emission tomography to localization of cerebral gliomas for biopsy. Neurosurgery 34: 994-1002.
  22. Simmons ML, Frondoza CG, Coyle JT (1991) Immunocytochemical localization of N-acetyl-aspartate with monoclonal antibodies. Neuroscience 45: 37-45.
  23. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Martinez AJ (1993) Unreliability of contemporary neurodiagnostic imaging in evaluating suspected adult supratentorial (low-grade) astrocytoma. J Neurosurg 79: 533-536.
  24. Messmer P, Baumann B, Suhm N, Jacob AL (2001) Navigation systems for image-guided therapy: a review. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173: 777-784.
  25. Croteau D, Scarpace L, Hearshen D, Gutierrez J, Fisher JL, et al. (2001) Correlation between magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and image-guided biopsies: semiquantitative and qualitative histopathological analyses of patients with untreated glioma. Neurosurgery 49: 823-829.
  26. Dowling C, Bollen AW, Noworolski SM, McDermott MW, Barbaro NM, et al. (2001) Preoperative proton MR spectroscopic imaging of brain tumors: correlation with histopathologic analysis of resection specimens. AJNR 22: 604-612.
  27. Rock JP, Hearshen D, Scarpace L, Croteau D, Gutierrez J, et al. (2002) Correlations between Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and image-guided histopathology, with special attention to radiation necrosis. Neurosurgery 51: 912-919.
  28. Shao W, Gu J, Huang C, Liu D, Huang H, et al. (2014) Malignancy-associated metabolic profiling of human glioma cell lines using 1H NMR spectroscopy. Mol Cancer 13: 197.
  29. Kamble RB, Peruvumba NJ, Shivashankar R (2014) Energy Status and Metabolism inIntracranial Space Occupying Lesions: A Prospective 31p Spectroscopic Study. J Clin Diagn Res 8: RC05-RC08.